Francis Ndichu Kahiga & 2 others v Mbo-I-Kamiti Farmers Co. Ltd & others [2013] KEELRC 9 (KLR)
The bottom line
#Kenya's Employment Court refused to reopen a settled labour dispute, ruling that complaints about an advocate's conduct belong with the Law Society, not the court.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether applicants could substitute claimants in a settled claim
Application rejected; no pending suit exists to justify substitution
The claim had been settled through a registered Consent Award with money paid out, and the court had marked the claim as settled and closed the file on 12th April 2013. The applicants themselves had authorized the very persons they now sought to replace, and were not Interested Parties. The court also detected mischief in a purported consent filed after the file was closed.
Whether leave to act in person should be granted
Refused as futile in a concluded matter
The applicants' real complaint concerned payment of the decretal sum by their advocates. That dispute does not warrant reopening proceedings; the proper remedy lies with the Law Society of Kenya or the Advocates Complaints Commission, not the Industrial Court.
Legal principles established
#- A concluded and settled matter cannot be reopened through substitution of claimants or withdrawal of advocates; grievances against advocates belong to disciplinary fora
Court orders
#- 1.The Application dated 24th September 2013 is rejected
- 2.Applicants may pursue the claim against their Advocate at the appropriate forum
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Original employment and labour relations jurisdiction of the Industrial Court
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Francis Ndichu Kahiga & 2 others v Mbo-I-Kamiti Farmers Co. Ltd & others [2013] KEELRC 9 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2013). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2013/9/eng@2013-12-17
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.