Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedELC Judicial Review Case No. 1 of 2022· [2026] KEELC 6266 (KLR)

Republic v Commissioner of Lands & Settlement, Director of Surveys & Chief Registrar of Titles, Ex Parte Samuru Gituto Farmers Co-operative Society Limited

Environment and Land Court of Kenya
30 September 2026
1,340 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court refused to pause a land dispute, ruling that having an appeal does not automatically stop a case from proceeding.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi (Nzili, J) determined a notice of application dated 14 October 2025 by the ex parte applicant, Samuru Gituto Farmers Co-operative Society Limited, seeking transfer of the judicial review suit to the Thika Environment and Land Court and, in the alternative, that the matter be held in abeyance pending Thika ELC E52B of 2023 and an intended appeal against the ruling of 18 September 2025 which had reviewed and set aside the judgment of 14 November 2023. The 9th and 10th interested parties opposed, describing stay as a discretionary remedy grantable only in exceptional circumstances. The court set out the established principles from Re Global Tours & Travels, Kenya Shell, Silverstein and related authorities: a pending appeal, explanation for not seeking stay in the Court of Appeal, arguability, nugatory effect, exceptional circumstances and timeliness. It accepted that the applicant had filed a notice of appeal and moved with speed, and that the appeal raised arguable issues. However, it held that the applicant had not met the conditions for a stay: the appeal would not be rendered academic if the judicial review notice of motion were heard, there were no exceptional circumstances justifying an expedited hearing being impeded, and the injustice of proceeding would fall more on the other parties than on the applicant. The application was disallowed, with the court observing that any aggrieved party may appeal after the hearing. No express costs order was made.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether stay of proceedings pending appeal should be granted

Holding

Stay was refused; the applicant failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances or that the appeal would be rendered nugatory.

Reasoning

The court applied the Global Tours & Travels and related principles: pending appeal, explanation for not seeking stay in the Court of Appeal, arguability, nugatory effect, exceptional circumstances and timeliness. Although the applicant filed a notice of appeal and moved with speed, the court held the appeal would not be academic if the judicial review notice of motion were heard, and that the injustice would fall more on the other parties than on the applicant.

p. 7
02

Whether the right of appeal warrants staying the trial court proceedings

Holding

The right of appeal is constitutional but does not automatically entitle a party to a stay; the hearing should follow its course with appeal thereafter.

Reasoning

Relying on Sakwa v Wamwanyi, the court acknowledged that a right of appeal actualises access to justice and should not be rendered nugatory. However, it held that given the history of the matter, it was preferable for the hearing to proceed and for any aggrieved party to appeal afterwards rather than impede an expedited hearing.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • Stay of proceedings is a discretionary remedy granted only in the interest of justice and in the clearest cases
  • An arguable appeal need not succeed; it must merely not be frivolous and deserve the court's consideration
  • The nugatory test asks whether what is to be stayed would be irreversible, worthless, futile or invalid

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated 14.10.2025 for transfer and stay of proceedings was disallowed; 'Orders accordingly.'
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 8 & 9 of the Law Reform Act Cap 26 and Order 53 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Republic v Commissioner of Lands & Settlement, Director of Surveys & Chief Registrar of Titles, Ex Parte Samuru Gituto Farmers Co-operative Society Limited", Case Analysis (2026). ELC Judicial Review Case No. 1 of 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/6266/eng@2026-09-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.