Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedELC Case No. 75 of 2017· [2026] KEELC 6238 (KLR)

Cyrus Anyona Ogwankwa v Verusmauti Nyaruri & 5 Others

Environment and Land Court
1 October 2026
1,633 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Kisii Environment and Land Court allowed a landowner's eviction of occupants from his land, but refused to punish anyone for contempt.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Kisii (A. Omollo J) determines a Notice of Motion dated 4th April 2026 by the plaintiff seeking eviction warrants against the defendants, declarations of contempt against them and the Deputy Registrar, police security for an auctioneer, and ancillary orders, in pursuit of a judgment of 22nd February 2023 which was upheld on appeal by the Court of Appeal. The defendants' response, filed by S.M. Sagwe & Co. Advocates, was unsworn and unlabelled; it alleged the plaintiff had forged the Chief's letter underpinning his grant ad litum in Succession Cause No. 1 of 2025 (MCSUCC/E001/2025, Estate of Onkundi Monyinyo), later dismissed, and that a decree can be varied or reviewed. The court held the response was neither a replying affidavit nor grounds properly carrying evidence, so applying Mbalanya v Waema its annexures could not be received and the forgery allegations remained unproved. Even if proved, absent a subsisting order varying or setting aside the decree they could not fetter execution. Noting that more than a year may have passed since the last order, the court observed a notice to show cause under Order 22 Rule 18 was necessary, though none was shown to have issued. The application was allowed only to the extent that eviction orders shall issue in terms of the decree, with the O.C.S. Nyamarambe Police Station to provide security; the contempt and other prayers were not granted and no express costs order was made.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the application for eviction warrants and contempt findings was merited

Holding

Allowed only to the extent of eviction in terms of the decree with police security; contempt and ancillary prayers not granted

Reasoning

The court held the decree, affirmed on appeal, entitled the plaintiff to eviction. Because more than a year may have elapsed since the last order, a notice to show cause under Order 22 Rule 18 was necessary. The defendants' response was not a sworn affidavit, so their allegations of forgery and revocation of the grant remained unproved and could not resist execution.

p. 8
02

Evidentiary status of the defendants' unsworn response

Holding

Treated benevolently as grounds of opposition, but annexures thereto cannot be relied on as evidence

Reasoning

The response was neither a replying affidavit nor a notice of preliminary objection. Relying on Mbalanya v Waema, the court held an affidavit and annexures constitute evidence, and unsealed/unsworn documents cannot be received; hence the forgery and revocation allegations were unproved.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • Where an application for execution is made more than one year after the date of the decree, a notice to show cause must issue to the judgment-debtor before execution
  • An unsworn response that is not a replying affidavit cannot properly introduce annexures as evidence; allegations therein remain unproved
  • Absent a subsisting order varying or setting aside a judgment and decree, allegations against a decree cannot fetter the decree-holder's right to realise the fruits of the judgment

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Eviction orders shall issue in terms of the decree of the court
  2. 2.The O.C.S., Nyamarambe Police Station shall provide the necessary security to facilitate execution, enforcement and/or implementation of the eviction orders
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010; Sections 38(a) Civil Procedure Act and Order 22 Rules 80, 81(1), 83, Order 49 Rule 1, Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Cyrus Anyona Ogwankwa v Verusmauti Nyaruri & 5 Others", Case Analysis (2026). ELC Case No. 75 of 2017. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/6238/eng@2026-10-01

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.