Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCStruck OutEnvironment and Land Case 97 of 2021· [2026] KEELC 5900 (KLR)

Ahmed v Tanui

Environment and Land Court
22 September 2026
2,052 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court struck out a landowner's contempt and enforcement application because her case was already on appeal before the Court of Appeal.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by GMA Ongondo, J of the Environment and Land Court at Kapsabet determined a notice of motion dated 3rd March 2026 by the plaintiff, Zahra Ahmed, against the defendant, Kipruto Tanui. The plaintiff, holding a judgment and decree of the court, sought the defendant's citation and punishment for contempt of orders of 14th February 2024, committal to civil jail or sequestration, an injunction restraining him from dealing with or disposing of Nandi/Kamobo/6695 and Nandi/Kamobo/6696, and police security to enable the Land Registrar and Surveyor to survey and transfer the suit parcel as ordered. She alleged the defendant had become violent, threatened officers, and was soliciting a purchaser for the land. The defendant opposed, arguing the application was premature since security committees had not commenced implementation, that an appeal (Court of Appeal Civil Application No. E041 of 2025) was pending at Eldoret, that he was not the registered owner and could not pass title, and that the alleged threats were unreported to police. The court framed three questions and, on the first, held that with a substantive appeal pending before the Court of Appeal, duplicate motions in lower or parallel benches are devoid of jurisdiction; jurisdiction had shifted upward and the court was functus officio. Declining to take any further step, it struck out the application with no orders as to costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the ELC retains jurisdiction over a contempt and enforcement application while an appeal from the same case is pending before the Court of Appeal

Holding

The court held it lacked jurisdiction; jurisdiction had shifted upward to the Court of Appeal and the court was functus officio over the application

Reasoning

Relying on John Mutua Ngunjiri v Silas Richard Mukolwe, the court held that where a substantive appeal is fully active before a senior appellate court, duplicate motions in lower or parallel benches are devoid of jurisdiction. The pending Court of Appeal Civil Application No. E041 of 2025 therefore ousted the ELC's jurisdiction over the contempt and enforcement application.

p. 4
02

Whether the Respondent should be cited for contempt and sanctioned, and whether an injunction and police security orders should issue

Holding

Not determined on the merits; the court declined to take any further step once it found the application was devoid of jurisdiction

Reasoning

The court noted the quasi-criminal nature of contempt and the applicable standard of proof (Sum v Koech) and the Giella v Cassman Brown injunction test, but held that having found the application devoid of jurisdiction, there was no need to make one more step. The application was struck out.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • When a substantive appeal arising from a matter is fully active before a senior appellate court, lower or parallel courts are devoid of jurisdiction over the matter
  • Lack of jurisdiction renders a court's decision void, not merely voidable; a void act is a nullity ab initio
  • A court's jurisdiction flows from the Constitution or legislation or both, and a court can only exercise jurisdiction as conferred by the Constitution or other written law

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated 3rd March 2026 is struck out with no orders as to costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Environment and Land Court Act jurisdiction; court declined to exercise it on account of a pending appeal (Court of Appeal Civil Application No. E041 of 2025)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ahmed v Tanui", Case Analysis (2026). Environment and Land Case 97 of 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/5900/eng@2026-09-22

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.