Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedEnvironment and Land Case Civil Suit 370 of 2011· [2026] KEELC 5548 (KLR)

Mueke & another v Co-operative Bank of Kenya Ltd & another

Environment and Land Court
22 September 2026
1,545 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court refused to pause a 15-year-old land dispute, ruling that stay applications filed late and without exceptional reasons are delaying tactics.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
In this ruling, the Environment and Land Court at Machakos (Koross J) determined the plaintiffs' notice of motion dated 20 February 2026 seeking a stay of proceedings in the main suit pending the hearing of Civil Appeal No. E402 of 2025 before the Court of Appeal, Nairobi, against the court's ruling of 29 April 2024 dismissing their application to join additional plaintiffs, amend the plaint and file further documents. The application, brought under Order 42 Rule 6(1) and Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Sections 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, was opposed by the 1st defendant, who argued it was a delaying tactic in a suit pending since 2011, that the plaintiffs' counsel had sought an adjournment to cease acting, and that continuing the trial would not negate the appeal. Framing a single issue - whether the legal threshold for a stay of proceedings was met - the court applied the Supreme Court's guidance in Khan v International Commercial Company (K) Ltd and Ringera J's principles in Global Tours & Travels. It held that a stay of proceedings pending an interlocutory appeal is a rare and exceptional remedy; that the Court of Appeal, as the appellate forum, was better positioned to assess arguability; and that the motion, filed long after leave to appeal was granted, was an afterthought by plaintiffs who had repeatedly delayed the 16-year-old suit. The motion was dismissed with costs in the cause, a hearing date was directed, and further applications were restricted to those filed with leave.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the threshold for stay of proceedings pending appeal was met

Holding

The motion was not merited; the stay was refused because the application was an afterthought, the plaintiffs had delayed the suit for years, and no exceptional circumstances were shown.

Reasoning

The court exercised judicious discretion guided by Order 42 Rule 6 and the Khan and Global Tours principles weighing expeditious disposal, arguability of the appeal and judicial time. It held the Court of Appeal better positioned to assess arguability, noted the 16-year pendency, the plaintiffs' adjournments and non-compliance with Order 11, and that the motion was filed long after leave to appeal was granted, making it a delaying tactic.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Stay of proceedings pending an interlocutory appeal is a rare and exceptional remedy, and where the court appealed from is seized of the appeal, the appellate court is better placed to assess arguability
  • Stay of proceedings is discretionary and granted only in deserving cases as it impacts the right to an expeditious trial

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The notice of motion dated 20 February 2026 is dismissed with costs in the cause
  2. 2.A hearing date for the main suit shall be issued
  3. 3.No further applications shall be filed in this matter except with leave of the Court
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 42 Rule 6(1) and Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules; Sections 1A, 1B & 3A of the Civil Procedure Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mueke & another v Co-operative Bank of Kenya Ltd & another", Case Analysis (2026). Environment and Land Case Civil Suit 370 of 2011. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/5548/eng@2026-09-22

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.