Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedKapsabet ELCC No. E004 of 2023

Kepkemboi & another v Kipkemboi (Suing as the administrator of the Estate of Kibet Arap Ngisirei-Deceased) (Environment and Land Case E004 of 2023) [2026] KEELC 5021 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
29 July 2026
1,139 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan land court paused collection of taxed costs while an appeal is pending, confirming it still has power to protect a case's subject matter after judgment.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The applicant, through Rotich Langat and Partners Advocates, moved the court by Notice of Motion dated 13th October 2025 seeking stay of execution of a Certificate of Costs and orders issued on 29th September 2025, further to a ruling of 12th September 2025, pending the hearing and determination of an appeal in Eldoret COACA No. E062 of 2025. The respondents, through Cheruiyot Kirui and Company Advocates, opposed the application, arguing that the court was functus officio following delivery of judgment, that costs were properly taxed, that no substantial loss was proved, and that the application was an abuse of process. In submissions, the respondents relied on Order 42 Rule 6(2) and Order 22 Rule 25 of the Civil Procedure Rules, and on the cases of Benjamin Karuga Kabiru and Butt v Rent Restriction Tribunal. The court framed a single issue: whether the applicant had satisfied the requirements for the orders sought. Relying on the Goldenberg Commission case, it held that execution before the court cannot proceed simultaneously with the pending appeal. It also affirmed its mandate under section 13(7) of the Environment and Land Court Act to grant interim preservation orders, including preservation of the subject matter of an appeal, citing the Supreme Court's decision in Board of Governors Moi High School Kabarak v Malcolm Bell on safeguarding the subject matter of the appeal. The court found the application merited, allowed it as prayed in paragraph 1(a), and made no orders as to costs. Judgment delivered at Kapsabet on 29th July 2026 by Hon. G M A Ongondo, Judge.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether this court is functus officio and lacks jurisdiction to entertain the application
  2. 2.Whether the applicant has satisfied the requirements for grant of stay of execution of the Certificate of Costs pending appeal

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the court retains jurisdiction to grant interim stay pending appeal

Holding

The court held it has jurisdiction to grant interim preservation orders under section 13(7) of the Environment and Land Court Act notwithstanding delivery of judgment

Reasoning

The court noted it has the mandate to grant interim preservation orders pursuant to section 13(7) of the Environment and Land Court Act, 2015, including preservation of the subject matter of an appeal. The functus officio objection raised by the respondents was not upheld; the court proceeded to determine the application on its merits.

p. 6
02

Whether execution should be stayed pending the appeal in Eldoret COACA No. E062 of 2025

Holding

Stay was granted because the appeal is pending and execution cannot run concurrently with the appeal

Reasoning

Relying on the Goldenberg Commission case and Butt v Rent Restriction Tribunal, the court reasoned that the applicant has an undoubted right of appeal and that the two matters should not proceed simultaneously, citing the principle that it would not be right for two matters on the same issue to be heard at the same time.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • Execution before the trial court cannot proceed simultaneously with a pending appeal on the same matter

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Stay of execution of the Certificate of costs and orders issued on 29th September 2025, further to the ruling of 12th September 2025, pending the hearing and determination of Eldoret COACA No. E062 of 2025
  2. 2.No orders as to costs

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

majority

Wrote the judgment

Jurisdiction invoked
Section 13(7) of the Environment and Land Court Act, 2015; Orders 22 Rule 25 and 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010

Relief refused

#

Costs of the application

The court granted the application but made no orders as to costs

p. 7

Costs

No orders as to costs

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

It therefore, themy finding that the application dated 13th October 2025, is merited.
p. 7Finding on the application
the said application is hereby allowed accordingly as stated in paragraph 1 (a) hereinabove with no orders as to costs.
p. 7Final orders
execution before this court cannot proceed simultaneous with the pending appeal at the Court of Appeal on the same matter.
p. 7Stay pending appeal

Issues in the judgment

#
minor

Typographical error in the judgment's finding

minor

Date conflict: the replying affidavit states judgment was delivered on 5th October 2024 while the ruling referenced is dated 12th September 2025

minor

Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act incorrectly cited with both 2015 and (2011) years

minor

Submissions dated 30th March 2026 attributed to counsel for the respondents, though the content supports the applicant

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kepkemboi & another v Kipkemboi (Suing as the administrator of the Estate of Kibet Arap Ngisirei-Deceased) (Environment and Land Case E004 of 2023) [2026] KEELC 5021 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Kapsabet ELCC No. E004 of 2023. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/5021/eng@2026-07-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.