Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCStruck OutKabarnet ELCLC No. E011 of 2025· [2026] KEELC 4914 (KLR)

Chebet (Legal Representative of Kabon Chepsergon) v Kipsoto (Administrator and Representative of Charles Kiptorus Ngabo) & 4 others (Environment and Land Case E011 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 4914 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
29 July 2026
2,251 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court struck out a land suit because the power of attorney backing it died with its donor, leaving the plaintiff with no authority to sue.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiff, Kipkebut Chebet, sued as legal representative of the estate of Kabon Chepsergon on the strength of a power of attorney, claiming to be the registered proprietor of land parcel Baringo/Kapshomuswo A/1324 and seeking re-issue of the title allegedly fraudulently issued to the 1st Defendant. The 1st Defendant moved the court by Notice of Motion dated 18th November 2025 under Order 2 Rule 15 of the Civil Procedure Rules seeking striking out of the plaint on the grounds that the donor of the power of attorney was deceased by the time suit was filed, that the instrument was neither stamped nor registered, and that the claim was time-barred. The Plaintiff opposed, initially denying proof of the donor's death but later confirming in a further affidavit that Kabon Chepsergon died on 16th September 2024, arguing that acts validly done during the donor's lifetime were not invalidated by his death. The court, relying on the Court of Appeal's decision in Loice Wanjiru Meru, held that a power of attorney is extinguished upon the death of the donor. Although mindful that striking out is draconian and that procedural lapses should not defeat suits, the court found the Plaintiff's lack of capacity and locus standi went to jurisdiction, and that only a limited grant ad litem or full letters of administration could restore capacity. The suit was struck out with costs to the 1st Defendant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Effect of the donor's death on a suit founded on a power of attorney

Holding

The power of attorney died with the donor; the Plaintiff lacks capacity to prosecute the suit

Reasoning

The court accepted that Kabon Chepsergon died on 16th September 2024, a fact first raised by the 1st Defendant but confirmed by the Plaintiff in his further affidavit. Following the Court of Appeal's decision in Loise Wanjiru Meru, the power of attorney was extinguished upon death. The defect goes to jurisdiction and locus standi, not a mere procedural lapse, so the leniency in Salat does not save the suit. Only a limited grant ad litem or full grant could clothe the Plaintiff with capacity.

p. 11
02

Whether striking out pleadings, a draconian remedy, was justified

Holding

Yes, because the incapacity goes to jurisdiction and the root of the suit, placing the matter in the clearest of cases

Reasoning

The court acknowledged KCB v Suntra and Ouko JA's admonition in Nicholas Salat against striking out pleadings for curable procedural lapses, and endorsed those principles as reflecting Article 159(2). However, it distinguished them because the absence of capacity is not a mere deviation of form but a jurisdictional defect that no grant ad litem or letters of administration could cure retroactively in this suit.

p. 11

Legal principles established

#
  • A power of attorney is extinguished upon the death of the donor and cannot found a suit filed after the donor's death; the donee must obtain a limited grant ad litem or full letters of administration

Court orders

#
  1. 1.This suit is struck out
  2. 2.The Plaintiff shall meet the 1st Defendant's costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 159(2) of the Constitution; Civil Procedure Act, Order 2 Rule 15(1)(b)(c) and (2)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Chebet (Legal Representative of Kabon Chepsergon) v Kipsoto (Administrator and Representative of Charles Kiptorus Ngabo) & 4 others (Environment and Land Case E011 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 4914 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Kabarnet ELCLC No. E011 of 2025. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/4914/eng@2026-07-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.