Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedApplication dated 16.04.2026 (Kilgoris)· [2026] KEELC 4901 (KLR)

Kiboi v Ole Lemunke (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Case E004 of 2026) [2026] KEELC 4901 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya
29 July 2026
1,205 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan High Court allowed a late appeal to proceed but refused to pause the case outcome, ruling that a dismissal is 'nothing' that can be stayed.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This first-instance decision by the High Court at Kilgoris (Hon. M.N Mwanyale, Judge) determined a pro se application dated 16.04.2026 by Paul Lemiso Kiboi seeking leave to appeal out of time against the Ruling of Hon. C.W. Waswa (SRM) delivered on 29 January 2026, together with a stay of execution of that Ruling (including costs) pending the appeal. The Respondent, Leparakuo Ole Lemunke, opposed, contending there was no sufficient cause for the delay, no arguable appeal, and that a dismissal is a negative order incapable of stay. Framing three issues, the court applied the principles in Leo Silla Mutiso v Rose Hellen Wangari Mwangi: length of delay, reason for delay, chances of success, and prejudice. It found the roughly three-and-a-half-month delay not inordinate; the claimed acute financial hardship far-fetched given that a Memorandum of Appeal attracts a court fee of only Kshs.1,550/=, but extended the applicant the benefit of doubt. It noted, however, that the draft memorandum's grounds did not flow from the impugned ruling, making the appeal's prospects underwhelming. On prejudice, the court found the Respondent would suffer none beyond delay in realizing judgment. The court therefore extended time for filing the appeal, deemed the draft memorandum filed upon payment of fees, and gave directions on typed proceedings and the record of appeal. It refused the stay, holding that a dismissal is a negative order with nothing to stay, and ordered costs of the application to abide the outcome of the appeal.

Key legal issues

#
01

Extension of time to file an appeal out of time

Holding

Although the stated reason (acute financial hardship) was far-fetched, the court extended time, finding the delay not inordinate and no prejudice to the Respondent beyond delay in realizing judgment

Reasoning

The ruling was delivered on 29 January 2026 and the application filed on 16 April 2026, a delay of about 3.5 months which was not inordinate. The court took judicial notice that a Memorandum of Appeal attracts a court fee of only Kshs.1,550/=, so the hardship claim was far-fetched, but the applicant was given the benefit of doubt. No prejudice beyond delay in realizing the judgment would be suffered. The draft memorandum's grounds, however, did not flow from the ruling, making the appeal's chances underwhelming.

p. 3
02

Stay of execution pending appeal

Holding

Stay of execution was refused because the ruling dismissed the suit, a negative order incapable of being stayed

Reasoning

The court accepted the Respondent's submission that the impugned order was one of dismissal of the suit. Since a dismissal is a negative order, there is nothing capable of being stayed. The prayer for stay of any consequential orders was therefore denied and dismissed.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • The decision whether or not to extend the time for appealing is essentially discretionary, taking into account length of delay, reason for delay, chances of the appeal succeeding and degree of prejudice to the Respondent
  • A dismissal order is a negative order in respect of which no stay of execution can issue

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Leave granted to the Applicant to file and serve an appeal out of time
  2. 2.The Draft Memo of Appeal deemed as duly filed upon payment of court fees
  3. 3.Proceedings to be typed within 45 days from the date of the order
  4. 4.Applicant to file the Record of Appeal within 30 days once the proceedings have been typed and certified
  5. 5.Prayer for stay of execution of any consequential orders denied and dismissed
  6. 6.Costs of the application to abide by the outcome of the Appeal
On appeal from
Trial court (Kilgoris)
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent discretion to extend time to appeal and grant stay of execution pending appeal

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kiboi v Ole Lemunke (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Case E004 of 2026) [2026] KEELC 4901 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Application dated 16.04.2026 (Kilgoris). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/4901/eng@2026-07-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.