Mabonga (The Recognised Agent of the Approved Agent of Joshua Mabonga Macheso) v Simiyu & 4 others (Environment and Land Case E001 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 4740 (KLR)
The bottom line
#The Environment and Land Court in Kitale refused to pause execution of a land judgment because the losing party waited too long and showed no real loss.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Unreasonable delay
The application filed over a month after judgment, without explanation, failed the delay requirement
The judgment was delivered on 15/4/2026 and the application filed on 25/5/2026, a delay of over a month which the applicant did not explain. The court noted that what amounts to unreasonable delay is assessed case by case, but an explanation must be offered; none was.
Substantial loss
Mere assertion or apprehension of irreparable harm does not establish substantial loss
Relying on James Wangalwa & Another v Agnes Naliaka Cheseto, the court held that execution being a lawful process is not itself substantial loss. The applicant, who only stated he would suffer irreparably if respondents buried their deceased mother on the land, did not demonstrate how execution of a lawful decree would irreparably affect the core of his appeal. A title deed can be cancelled and re-registered if the appeal succeeds.
Security for due performance of the decree
No security was offered, but the omission is not fatal as the court can impose conditions suo motu
The applicant offered no security for the due performance of the decree. However, the court held this in itself was not fatal, since the court can on its own motion impose conditions, including depositing security for costs. Despite this, the cumulative failure on delay and substantial loss meant the discretion could not be exercised in the applicant's favour.
Legal principles established
#- The conditions for stay of execution pending appeal are substantial loss, application without unreasonable delay, and security for due performance of the decree
- Execution of a lawful decree does not in itself amount to substantial loss; the loss must be real and apparent
- Failure to offer security is not fatal since the court may on its own motion impose conditions including security
- The court must balance a litigant's right of appeal against the successful party's right to enjoy the fruits of judgment
Court orders
#- 1.The application dated 25/5/2026 is dismissed
- 2.Costs of the application are awarded to the respondents
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Order 42 Rule 6(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules (stay of execution pending appeal)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Mabonga (The Recognised Agent of the Approved Agent of Joshua Mabonga Macheso) v Simiyu & 4 others (Environment and Land Case E001 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 4740 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). ELC NO. E001 OF 2025. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/4740/eng@2026-07-24
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.