Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in the judgment (application dated 11th November, 2024 in a suit filed by Plaint dated 30th November, 2022)· [2026] KEELC 3606 (KLR)

Kimilgo (Suing as the Administrator of the Estate of the Late Kimilgo Arap Kukuto) v Cherono (Sued as Administratrix of the Estate of the late Ezekiel Kibet Bor) (Environment and Land Case E019 of 2022) [2026] KEELC 3606 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
11 June 2026
2,686 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The court dismissed a landowner's request to have surveyors map boundaries, ruling that boundary disputes must go to the Land Registrar first, not the court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Kericho (L. A. Omollo, J) determines a Notice of Motion dated 11th November, 2024 in a suit in which the Plaintiff claims, inter alia, five acres to be hived off from Kericho/Kapsuser/439 (now subdivided into Kericho/Kapsuser/7498-7503) by adverse possession. The parties had entered a partial mediation agreement, adopted as a court order on 24th July, 2024, under which the Defendant agreed to surrender two acres; the remaining three acres claimed were referred back to court for hearing. On 14th October, 2024 the court granted the Plaintiff leave to file an application seeking orders for the District Land Registrar to effect the mediation settlement. The application instead sought orders directing the Land Registrar and District Land Surveyor Kericho to visit the suit parcels, file a report with sketches and GPS coordinates on size and occupation, establish boundaries, and propose implementation of the mediation agreement. The Defendant opposed through Grounds of Opposition, contending the application went beyond the agreed issues and amounted to a fishing expedition, and further alleging forgery of the supporting affidavit's signature. The court held that the prayers exceeded the scope of the leave granted and that boundary establishment and demarcation must be sought by formal application to the Land Registrar under sections 18 and 19 of the Land Registration Act, applying Shari v Daniel & 4 others. It also observed, applying Catholic Diocese of Meru Trustees v Agastine Njagi Njiiri, that forgery allegations are issues of fact and improperly raised in Grounds of Opposition. The application was dismissed with costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the court should order the District Land Registrar and District Land Surveyor Kericho to visit the suit land, file a report with GPS coordinates and propose implementation of the partial mediation agreement

Holding

The application is dismissed; the prayers exceed the leave granted and boundary determination must be sought from the Land Registrar by formal application.

Reasoning

The Plaintiff was granted leave only to seek orders compelling the Land Registrar to effect the partial mediation agreement, under which the Defendant surrendered two acres. Instead, the application asks the Surveyor and Registrar to map occupation of all occupiers, determine boundaries and propose implementation - matters beyond that leave. Following Shari v Daniel & 4 others, the proper route for boundary establishment and demarcation is a formal application to the Land Registrar under sections 18 and 19 of the Land Registration Act, not a court motion of this kind.

p. 6
02

Whether allegations of forgery of the supporting affidavit can be raised in Grounds of Opposition

Holding

No; forgery allegations are issues of fact and ought not to have been raised in Grounds of Opposition, which raise issues of law only.

Reasoning

The Defendant's Grounds of Opposition alleged that the signature on the supporting affidavit did not resemble that on the 2022 affidavit, amounting to forgery. Relying on Catholic Diocese of Meru Trustees (Registered) v Agastine Njagi Njiiri & 3 others, the court held that grounds of opposition raise issues of law only. Allegations of forgery being issues of fact, they were improperly raised in that forum, though the court did not decide the forgery allegation on its merits.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • A party seeking establishment or demarcation of a boundary must formally apply to the Land Registrar under sections 18 and 19 of the Land Registration Act; the court will not, on a motion, direct the Registrar and Surveyor to survey and propose implementation of a settlement beyond the leave granted.
  • Grounds of opposition raise issues of law only and not facts; allegations of forgery are issues of fact and should not be raised in Grounds of Opposition.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Plaintiff/Applicant's Notice of Motion application dated 11th November, 2024 is dismissed with costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 50
  • Land Registration Actsections 18 and 19 (particularly 19(1) and (2))

Cases cited (2)

  • Shari v Daniel & 4 others
    [2025] KEELC 5021 (KLR)
  • Catholic Diocese of Meru Trustees (Registered) v Agastine Njagi Njiiri & 3 others
    [2017] KEELC 506 (KLR)
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent jurisdiction of the Court to preserve the integrity of its processes (invoked by the Applicant); original civil suit under the Court's land jurisdiction

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kimilgo (Suing as the Administrator of the Estate of the Late Kimilgo Arap Kukuto) v Cherono (Sued as Administratrix of the Estate of the late Ezekiel Kibet Bor) (Environment and Land Case E019 of 2022) [2026] KEELC 3606 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Not stated in the judgment (application dated 11th November, 2024 in a suit filed by Plaint dated 30th November, 2022). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/3606/eng@2026-06-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.