Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCOtherNot stated in the judgment· [2026] KEELC 3562 (KLR)

Lagat v Rono & 2 others (Environment and Land Case 967 of 2021) [2026] KEELC 3562 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
8 June 2026
361 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~1 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court confirmed anyone can freely withdraw their case before judgment, and a withdrawn contempt application ended with no one paying costs.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This short ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Kapsabet (Ongondo, J) dealt with a Notice of Motion dated 19th May 2026 in which the Decree Holder/Applicant/Plaintiff, Esther Jeptanui Lagat, sought, inter alia, leave to issue summons to the 2nd and 3rd respondents to show cause why they should not be committed to civil jail for up to two years for disobeying court orders issued on 30th November 2023 and 19th December 2024. The respondents never filed a response and were absent when the matter came up for directions on 8th June 2026. Mr. Kibii, counsel for the decree holder, presented a Notice of Withdrawal dated 8th June 2026 and sought leave to withdraw the entire application with no orders as to costs, noting that the matter would otherwise proceed by way of a warrant of arrest issued by the Deputy Registrar. The court held that a party has a constitutional right to freely and voluntarily withdraw a matter before the court, citing Robert Lelli v Kenya Medical Training College & 2 others (2021) eKLR, and observed that such withdrawal accords with Article 159(2)(b) of the Constitution, which provides that justice shall not be delayed. Finding the notice to have merit, the court marked the application of 19th May 2026 as withdrawn in its entirety. Invoking the proviso to Section 27(1) of the Civil Procedure Act and the Supreme Court's decision in Jasbir Singh Rai & others v Tarlochan Rai & others (2014) eKLR, the judge made no orders as to costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Right to withdraw an application before the court

Holding

The Notice of Withdrawal dated 8th June 2026 was allowed; a party may freely and voluntarily withdraw a matter, and such withdrawal aligns with the constitutional imperative that justice shall not be delayed

Reasoning

Counsel for the decree holder sought to withdraw the entire contempt application, noting it was unresponded to and set only for directions. The court held withdrawal is an established right and consistent with Article 159(2)(b). Since the withdrawal was voluntary, the application was marked withdrawn in its entirety.

p. 1
02

Costs on withdrawal

Holding

No orders as to costs were made, invoking the proviso to Section 27(1) of the Civil Procedure Act and the Supreme Court decision in Jasbir Singh Rai & others v Tarlochan Rai & others

Reasoning

Exercising the discretion under the proviso to Section 27(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, and guided by Jasbir Singh Rai & others v Tarlochan Rai & others (2014) eKLR, the court declined to award costs to any party, there being no response to the withdrawn application.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A party has a constitutional right to freely and voluntarily withdraw a matter before court

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated 19th May 2026 is hereby marked as withdrawn in entirety
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent jurisdiction over contempt and Notice of Withdrawal under Article 159(2)(b) of the Constitution and Section 27(1) of the Civil Procedure Act (Chapter 21, Laws of Kenya); specific case number not stated

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Lagat v Rono & 2 others (Environment and Land Case 967 of 2021) [2026] KEELC 3562 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/3562/eng@2026-06-08

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.