Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in the judgment (memorandum of appeal dated 9-5-2025, filed 12-5-2025)· [2026] KEELC 3344 (KLR)

Car Wash Den Limited (Suing Through One of the Directors Samuel Kimani Karanja) v Njoroge & 2 others (Environment and Land Appeal E017 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 3344 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court (inferred; appeal pending before this Court at Murang'a)
28 May 2026
193 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~1 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court in Murang'a dismissed an appeal that sat idle for over a year because the appellants never filed the record of appeal.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a short first-instance ruling dismissing an appeal for want of prosecution. The memorandum of appeal was dated 9-5-2025 and filed on 12-5-2025, but the record of appeal was never filed or served. The matter came up for mention on several occasions - 1-12-2025, 23-2-2026, 30-4-2026 and the date of the ruling - and on each occasion the Court indulged the appellants' counsel, allowing him time to file and serve the record. A last adjournment was granted on 30-4-2026, approximately a month before the ruling. At the mention, counsel for the appellants informed the Court that he had lost touch with his clients and wished to file an application to cease acting, which the Court observed should have been done much earlier. Finding that the appellants had been indulged for a long time and were plainly unwilling to prosecute their appeal, M.N. Gicheru Judge dismissed the appeal under Order 42 rule 35 of the Civil Procedure Rules and awarded costs to the respondents and the interested party. The ruling was dated, signed and delivered virtually at Murang'a on 28 May 2026. No authorities were cited, no substantive issues were determined, and the underlying dispute was not reached on its merits.

Key legal issues

#
01

Dismissal of appeal for want of prosecution

Holding

The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution where the appellants failed to file and serve the record of appeal for over a year despite numerous indulgences and a last adjournment.

Reasoning

The appeal was filed on 12-5-2025 but the record of appeal was never filed. The matter came up for mention on several dates (1-12-2025, 23-2-2026, 30-4-2026) and on each occasion the Court indulged the appellants' counsel. A last adjournment was given on 30-4-2026. Counsel then indicated he had lost touch with his clients and wished to cease acting, which the Court held should have been done earlier. The Court found the appellants unwilling to prosecute and dismissed the appeal with costs.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • An appeal that is not prosecuted through filing and service of the record of appeal despite repeated indulgences may be dismissed for want of prosecution under Order 42 rule 35 of the Civil Procedure Rules, with costs.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Appeal is dismissed under Order 42 rule 35 of the Civil Procedure Rules
  2. 2.Costs of the appeal awarded to the Respondents and the interested party
On appeal from
Not stated
Not stated
Jurisdiction invoked
Appeal pending before this Court; dismissal powers under Order 42 rule 35 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Car Wash Den Limited (Suing Through One of the Directors Samuel Kimani Karanja) v Njoroge & 2 others (Environment and Land Appeal E017 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 3344 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Not stated in the judgment (memorandum of appeal dated 9-5-2025, filed 12-5-2025). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/3344/eng@2026-05-28

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.