Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCOtherNotice of Motion dated 23rd October 2025 (Nyeri ELC)· [2026] KEELC 3011 (KLR)

Nyaga & 5 others (Suing on their behalf and as officials, on behalf of Mathari Villagers’ Self Help Project'S Membership) v Registered Trustees Catholiс Archdiocese of Nyeri (Environment and Land Case 119 of 2013) [2026] KEELC 3011 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
14 May 2026
1,985 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Applicants, members of the Mathari Self-Help Group who purchased and occupied 600 acres from the Respondent in the 1970s, moved the Court by Notice of Motion dated 23rd October 2025 seeking vesting orders to give effect to consent orders dated 31st May 2018 and further orders dated 18th November 2021, under which a licensed surveyor was authorised to excise 600 acres from specified parcels and the Executive Officer/Deputy Registrar was empowered to sign transfer deeds. The Court of Appeal had struck out the Respondent's appeal against those orders on 28th February 2025. The Respondent opposed, asserting unclean hands and non-disclosure, and relying on conservatory orders issued on 5th November 2014 in Nyeri ELC Petition No. 205 of 2014 (Original Petition No. 14 of 2013), which preserve the suit properties - notably LR 9464, which overlaps with the parcels in the vesting orders - pending judgment. The Respondent argued the application offended Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act (sub judice) and risked contempt, citing Supreme Court and Court of Appeal authority. The court, E. K. Makori J, held the application had merit, since the orders of 18/11/2021 stood after the appeal was struck out, but refrained from granting them immediately because a Petition involving the same property was pending. The court stayed the application, to be activated immediately upon delivery of judgment in ELC Petition No. 205 of 2014, to avoid contradictory orders, chaos and confusion. Costs were awarded in the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Entitlement to vesting orders under Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act

Holding

The Applicants made a good case and the application had merit, since the orders of 18/11/2021 stand after the appeal was struck out as incompetent

Reasoning

The court traced the consent order of 31/5/2018 requiring excision of 600 acres and the further orders of 18/11/2021 authorising a licensed surveyor to excise and the Executive Officer/Deputy Registrar to sign transfer deeds. The Court of Appeal struck out the appeal against those orders on 28th February 2025, leaving them standing. The court held the application merited allowance on that basis, but tempered the outcome because of the parallel Petition.

p. 5
02

Effect of subsisting conservatory orders in a parallel petition over the same land

Holding

The application was stayed rather than allowed, to avoid conflicting orders and possible contempt, pending judgment in ELC Petition No. 205 of 2014

Reasoning

The Respondent exhibited conservatory orders issued on 5th November 2014 in ELC Petition No. 205 of 2014 restraining dealing with plots including LR 9464, which overlaps with the parcels in the vesting orders. The court noted the sub judice and res judicata rules exist to prevent contradictory orders, and that LR 9464 appears in both cases. It declined to authorise steps that might violate the preservation orders before the Petition is determined.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • A vesting order may be granted under Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act to transfer ownership of property without the traditional land process, in lieu of a conveyance, where a person neglects or refuses to comply with a decree directing execution of a conveyance
  • Courts should refrain from issuing contradictory orders over the same property; where parallel proceedings involving the same suit property are pending, a meritorious application may be stayed to prevent chaos and confusion

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The current application is stayed and shall be activated immediately upon the judgment in Nyeri ELC Petition No. 205 of 2014
  2. 2.Costs in the cause
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act, Cap 21 (vesting orders); enforcement of orders of the ELC dated 18/11/2021

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Nyaga & 5 others (Suing on their behalf and as officials, on behalf of Mathari Villagers’ Self Help Project'S Membership) v Registered Trustees Catholiс Archdiocese of Nyeri (Environment and Land Case 119 of 2013) [2026] KEELC 3011 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Notice of Motion dated 23rd October 2025 (Nyeri ELC). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/3011/eng@2026-05-14

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.