Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment· [2026] KEELC 2520 (KLR)

Samimpex Kenya Limited v Omar & 5 others (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E002 of 2020) [2026] KEELC 2520 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
30 April 2026
619 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court gave a landowner one final year to enforce a decade-old eviction order, warning that delays in executing judgments will not be tolerated indefinitely.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The applicant, through two notices of motion dated 6th November 2025 and 10th December 2025, sought extension of time to execute eviction orders dated 3rd February 2015 arising from a judgment of 2nd May 2014 in Milimani High Court ELCC No. 548 of 2013, in which it was declared the rightful owner of Garissa Town/Block5/3. The orders had earlier been extended on 23rd April 2021 following a ruling by Cherono J of 19th April 2021. The applicant attributed its failure to execute to financial constraints, relying on an auctioneer's quotation of Kshs. 1,500,000/= dated 11th February 2015, and complained that the respondents had continued developing, selling and leasing portions of the property despite a notice to vacate dated 13th January 2020. The applications, though served, were unopposed. S. M. Kibunja, ELC Judge, observed that the applicant knew of the auctioneer's quotation when it obtained the 2021 extension and had not explained what steps it took since then to raise the funds for execution. Emphasising that litigation must come to an end, the court extended time for execution by one year from 30th April 2026, directed the OCS Garissa Police Station to provide security during the eviction upon payment of applicable fees, and ordered the applicant to bear its own costs of the applications as it was responsible for the delay that necessitated their filing. The alternative prayer for fresh eviction orders was not granted, the court treating the applications as ones for extension of the existing order.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether to extend further the time for execution of a stale eviction order

Holding

Extension granted, but for a limited one-year period only, because the applicant failed to explain what steps it took since the 2021 extension

Reasoning

The court noted the auctioneers' quotation of Kshs. 1,500,000/= was known to the applicant when it obtained the 2021 extension, yet no explanation was given for inaction since then. Balancing the applicant's right to the fruits of judgment against the need for finality, the court granted a one-year extension rather than an open-ended one.

p. 2
02

Entitlement to police security during execution

Holding

Security granted, limited to the OCS Garissa Police Station and conditioned on payment of applicable fees

Reasoning

Although the applicant sought security from the Inspector General, OCPD and OCS, the court tailored the order to the OCS Garissa Police Station only, upon payment of applicable fees, a conventional condition where a party seeks state assistance in executing civil processes.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Litigation must come to an end and the court will grant only a limited period within which to execute an eviction order where the applicant has not diligently prosecuted execution
  • A party responsible for the delay that necessitated an application bears its own costs of that application

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Time to execute the eviction orders dated 3rd February 2015, earlier extended vide the ruling of 19th April 2021 and decree of 23rd April 2021, is extended by one year from 30th April 2026
  2. 2.The OCS Garissa Police Station to provide security during the eviction, upon payment of applicable fees, if any
  3. 3.The applicant to meet its own costs in the two applications
Jurisdiction invoked
Original civil jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court; the suit property Garissa Town/Block5/3 was adjudicated in Milimani High Court ELCC No. 548 of 2013

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Samimpex Kenya Limited v Omar & 5 others (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E002 of 2020) [2026] KEELC 2520 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/2520/eng@2026-04-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.