Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in ruling (Originating Summons dated 21st May, 2025)· [2026] KEELC 2173 (KLR)

Chemutai (Suing as the Administratrix of the Estate of Ezekiel Chepkwony alias Kipkemoi A Chepkwony) v Maritim & another (Sued as the Administrators of the Estate of Maritim Maina) (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E010 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 2173 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
16 April 2026
3,030 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~12 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court confirmed you can claim land by adverse possession against a deceased person's estate, dismissing the objection.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Kericho (L. A. Omollo, J) determined a preliminary objection dated 7th July, 2025 raised by the Defendants, the legal representatives of the estate of Maritim Maina (deceased), against the Plaintiff's Originating Summons dated 21st May, 2025. The Plaintiff, administratrix of the estate of Ezekiel Chepkwony alias Kipkemoi A. Chepkwony, sought declarations that her father's estate acquired title to 4 acres of land parcel Kericho/Kimolwet/168 by adverse possession, a declaration of ownership, and a permanent injunction, alleging a 1973 purchase from Joseph A. Maritim and over 50 years of open occupation. The Defendants objected on four grounds: lack of jurisdiction because the suit land belongs to a deceased person's estate; that no adverse possession claim lies against an estate; that the application and Originating Summons are fatally defective under Order 24 of the Civil Procedure Rules; and that the suit is an abuse of court process. The court, citing Motor Vessel Lillian S on jurisdiction and Ekessa v Magero and related authorities, held that adverse possession may be claimed against a deceased's estate since the claim runs against title, not the current holders. It found the Order 24 and abuse-of-process grounds rested on disputed factual questions unsuitable for a preliminary objection. All four grounds failed and the preliminary objection was dismissed with costs, costs to be in the cause. The suit remains for full trial.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the ELC has jurisdiction over an adverse possession claim against a deceased person's estate

Holding

Grounds 1 and 2 of the Preliminary Objection fail; adverse possession may be claimed against a deceased's estate

Reasoning

The court noted the claim is against the title, not the current holders, and adopted authority holding that adverse possession claims can be filed against estates of deceased persons, citing Ekessa v Magero, Karuntimi Raiji v M'makinya M'itunga and Peter Thuo Kairo v Kuria Gacheru.

p. 6
02

Whether the suit offends Order 24 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Holding

Ground 3 fails; no defect under Order 24 was demonstrated

Reasoning

The court observed that parties are suing and being sued as legal representatives of estates, and the Defendants did not show how the proceedings offend Order 24, which governs death and bankruptcy of parties. Whether the sale agreement was made by Maritim Maina is a factual issue for trial.

p. 6
03

Whether the suit is an abuse of court process due to alleged intermeddling

Holding

Ground 4 fails; intermeddling is a factual issue beyond a preliminary objection

Reasoning

The Defendants' abuse-of-process contention rested on the allegation that the Plaintiff is intermeddling with the estate. The court held this is a factual question requiring evidence and cannot be determined on a preliminary objection.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • A claim for land by way of adverse possession can be filed against the estate of a deceased person
  • A preliminary objection must raise a pure point of law and cannot rest on disputed facts requiring evidence
  • Costs follow the event under Section 27 of the Civil Procedure Act

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Defendants' Preliminary Objection dated 7th July, 2025 is dismissed with costs
  2. 2.The said costs shall be in the cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 24
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 2 Rule 15
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 37 Rule 7
  • Environment and Land Court ActSection 13
  • Law of Succession ActSection 29
  • Law of Succession ActSection 66
  • Law of Succession ActSection 45
  • Civil Procedure Act (Cap. 21)Section 27

Cases cited (9)

  • Boniface Munyao versus Mutinda & 2 Others
    [2016] eKLR
  • Munai vs Langat (Sued in his capacity as the Administrator and Personal Representative of the Estate of Talelei w/o Chemosit alias Taplule W/O Chemosit- Deceased)
    [2023] KEELC 146 (KLR)
  • Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd vs West End Distributors Ltd
    [1969] EA 696
  • Ushago Diani Investment Limited v Abdulwahab (Environment & Land Case 12 of 2023)
    [2023] KEELC 20213 (KLR)
  • Oraro v Mbaja
    [2005] eKLR 141
  • Motor Vessel "lillian S" -V- Caltex Oil (Kenya) Ltd
    C.A. Civil Appeal No 50 of 1989
  • Ekessa v Magero & another
    [2026] KEELC 1187 (KLR)
  • Karuntimi Raiji -v- M'makinya M'itunga
    2013 eKLR
  • Peter Thuo Kairo -V- Kuria Gacheru
    1988 2 KLR III
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Chemutai (Suing as the Administratrix of the Estate of Ezekiel Chepkwony alias Kipkemoi A Chepkwony) v Maritim & another (Sued as the Administrators of the Estate of Maritim Maina) (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E010 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 2173 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Not stated in ruling (Originating Summons dated 21st May, 2025). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/2173/eng@2026-04-16

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.