Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment

Gulf African Bank Limited v Barre (Environment and Land Case 868 of 2016) [2026] KEELC 2126 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
21 April 2026
1,564 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court confirmed that winning parties can claim 14% yearly interest on taxed court costs even when the original judgment said nothing about interest.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The appellant, the 3rd defendant/decree holder, appealed against the ruling of Hon. Judith Omollo, Deputy Registrar, delivered on 24th March 2025, which allowed its notice of motion dated 12th November 2024 - seeking payment of taxed costs of KShs. 2,009,370.88 with interest at 14% per annum and, in default, committal to civil jail - but refused interest on the taxed costs. The deputy registrar had reasoned that interest on costs could only be computed where a special order for interest was made at the time judgment on costs was entered on 30th May 2017, and there was none. The appeal was unopposed, the respondent having filed no submissions. The court, applying the Mwanasokoni v Kenya Bus Service standard for interference on first appeal, revisited the record. It held that although the judgment of 30th May 2017 was silent on interest on costs, interest becomes payable after taxation. Relying on Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act on the finality of an unchallenged certificate of taxation, Rule 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order as construed in Lubulellah & Associates Advocates v N.K. Brothers Ltd and Otieno, Ragot & Company Advocates v Kenya Airports Authority, and Sections 26(2) and 27(2) of the Civil Procedure Act, the court awarded interest at 14% per annum on the taxed sum of KShs. 1,135,853.14 from the date of the certificate of taxation until payment in full. The other prayers in the motion had been allowed as prayed. The appeal was allowed with costs to the appellant, borne by the respondent. Notably, the final orders misstate the certificate of taxation date as 14th November 2024 in two places, while the body of the judgment records it as 14th November 2019.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether the appeal against the ruling of the deputy registrar disallowing interest on taxed costs has merit

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a decree silent on interest on costs carries interest from the date of taxation

Holding

Yes - interest becomes payable after taxation, at 14% per annum from the date of the certificate of taxation

Reasoning

The court analysed Sections 26(2) and 27(2) of the Civil Procedure Act, which deem interest at 6% where the decree is silent and permit interest on costs up to 14% per annum. Relying on Lubulellah and Otieno, Ragot, it held that once costs are taxed and remain unpaid, interest at 14% may properly be awarded under Rule 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order, notwithstanding the silence of the judgment of 30th May 2017.

p. 3
02

Standard of interference with the deputy registrar's decision on first appeal

Holding

The court is entitled to revisit and evaluate the evidence and arrive at its own conclusion, but will not disturb findings of fact based on no evidence, misapprehension of evidence or wrong principles

Reasoning

Applying Mwanasokoni v Kenya Bus Service Ltd, the court stated the classic first-appeal standard. It then evaluated the notice of motion and concluded that the deputy registrar erred in holding that interest on costs could only be computed if a special order for interest had been made at the time judgment was entered.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A certificate of taxation not set aside or altered is final as to the amount of costs covered
  • Interest on taxed costs is payable under Rule 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order to compensate the successful party for delay in settlement
  • Where the decree is silent on interest, interest is deemed payable from the date of taxation, and may be awarded at up to 14% per annum under Section 27(2) of the Civil Procedure Act

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The memorandum of appeal dated 26th March, 2025 is allowed; the ruling of 24th March, 2025 is set aside to the extent that it disallowed interest on costs
  2. 2.The notice of motion dated 12th November, 2024 is allowed and the appellant is entitled to interest on costs on the taxed sum of Kshs. 1,135,853.14 at the rate of 14% per annum from 14th November 2019 until payment in full
  3. 3.The appellant is awarded the costs of the appeal, to be borne by the respondent

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

majority

Wrote the judgment

On appeal from
Environment and Land Court (Deputy Registrar)
null
Jurisdiction invoked
First appellate jurisdiction over the ruling of the Deputy Registrar on a notice of motion under Sections 1A, 1B, 34, 38 and 63 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 22 Rule 18(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules

Relief refused

#

Interest from a date earlier than the certificate of taxation / any rate above 14% per annum

The court limited interest to 14% per annum from the date of the certificate of taxation as provided by Section 27(2) of the Civil Procedure Act

p. 4

Costs

The appellant is awarded the costs of the appeal, the same to be borne by the respondent.

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

In view of the above provisions of the law, the appellant is entitled to interest at the rate of 14% per annum from 14th November, 2019 when the certificate of taxation was issued until payment in full.
p. 4Entitlement to interest on taxed costs
The memorandum of appeal dated 26th March, 2025 has merit and it is hereby allowed as in the following terms:
p. 4Disposition
The notice of motion dated 12th November, 2024 is hereby allowed, and the appellant is entitled to interest on costs as per the certificate of taxation issued on 14th November, 2024 awarding the sum of Kshs. 1,135, 853.14/- at the rate of 14% per annum from 14th November, 2024 until payment in full.
p. 4Final orders - interest on taxed costs
The appellant is awarded the costs of the appeal, the same to be borne by the respondent.
p. 4Costs

Issues in the judgment

#
minor

The court itself is not expressly named on the face of the judgment; only the judge's title and virtual delivery are stated

material

The full names of the parties are not stated anywhere in the judgment; they are referred to only as the appellant (3rd defendant/decree holder) and respondent (judgment debtor)

material

The final orders state the certificate of taxation and its interest commencement date as 14th November, 2024, whereas the body of the judgment and the impugned record place the certificate of taxation on 14th November, 2019

minor

The stated date of delivery, 21st April 2026, appears inconsistent with the procedural timeline (appeal filed March 2025, submissions June 2025)

minor

The appellant is said to have filed submissions dated 3rd June 2025 and further submissions dated 19th March 2025, a chronology inconsistency within the judgment

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Gulf African Bank Limited v Barre (Environment and Land Case 868 of 2016) [2026] KEELC 2126 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/2126/eng@2026-04-21

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.