Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in judgment (ELC suit, Nairobi)· [2026] KEELC 1743 (KLR)

Shantaben and Associates (C/o Shabana Osman & company Associates, Advocates)Shantaben and Associates v Tile City Limited & 3 others (Environment and Land Case E526 of 2024) [2026] KEELC 1743 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
23 March 2026
1,427 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court confirmed it can hear tenancy disputes even when the money involved falls below the amount that would normally send a case to a lower court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiff sued for Ksh 3,000,661 in rent arrears (March to October 2024), Ksh 6,614,356 as loss and damage for the unlawful expiry of the lease for its unexpired term (November 2024 to February 2026), costs and interest, concerning shop number one on land parcel described in the plaint. The defendants filed a preliminary objection dated 18th September 2025 contending that the court lacked jurisdiction under section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act and lacked pecuniary jurisdiction. The plaintiff, in a replying affidavit and submissions relying on the predominant purpose test and the Chakama Ranching case, maintained the dispute concerned use and occupation of land. The court applied the Mukisa Biscuit test as restated in Oraro v Mbaja, finding the objection a pure point of law since it challenged jurisdiction and could dispose of the suit. On the merits, the court found the lease, signed on 25th November 2020 for 5 years and 3 months, was still subsisting when the suit was filed on 19th December 2024, so the dispute over breach of the tenancy fell within section 13(2)(e) of the ELC Act. On pecuniary jurisdiction, the court held the Magistrates Courts Act does not oust its jurisdiction over lower-value suits; the remedy would be transfer, not striking out, striking out being a last resort. The preliminary objection was dismissed with costs to the plaintiff.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the preliminary objection on jurisdiction is a pure point of law

Holding

It is, because it questions the court's jurisdiction and, if successful, would dispose of the whole suit.

Reasoning

Applying Mukisa Biscuit and Oraro v Mbaja, the court held that an objection founded on the absence of statutory jurisdiction, if successful, would end the matter and raises no contested facts, thereby meeting the threshold of a true preliminary objection.

p. 3
02

Whether the dispute falls within section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act

Holding

Yes; the tenancy agreement was still in place when the suit was filed and the dispute concerns use and occupation of land.

Reasoning

The lease signed on 25th November 2020 was for 5 years and 3 months, lapsing in February 2026, while the suit was filed on 19th December 2024. The dispute over alleged unlawful termination and rent arrears therefore concerned land use and occupation, attracting the ELC's exclusive jurisdiction.

p. 4
03

Whether the court has pecuniary jurisdiction

Holding

Yes; the Magistrates Courts Act does not oust the ELC's jurisdiction over lower-value suits.

Reasoning

The court held that although cases should ordinarily be filed in the lowest court having regard to pecuniary jurisdiction, the consequence of any error is transfer to the lower court, not striking out, striking out pleadings being a last resort.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Disputes relating to leases, tenancies and contracts involving land fall within the jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court under section 13(2)(e) of the ELC Act.
  • The Magistrates Courts Act does not oust the ELC's jurisdiction over cases whose value is below Kshs 20 million; the remedy is transfer, not striking out.
  • Where a tenancy relationship still exists at filing, breach of the tenancy agreement is a dispute the ELC can entertain.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The notice of preliminary objection dated 18th September 2025 lacks merit and is dismissed with costs to the plaintiff
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 13(2)(e) of the Environment and Land Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Shantaben and Associates (C/o Shabana Osman & company Associates, Advocates)Shantaben and Associates v Tile City Limited & 3 others (Environment and Land Case E526 of 2024) [2026] KEELC 1743 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Not stated in judgment (ELC suit, Nairobi). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/1743/eng@2026-03-23

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.