Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedPetition dated 30-6-2025 (Notice of Motion dated 30-6-2025)· [2026] KEELC 1409 (KLR)

Murang’a County Initiative (MCI) Company Limited v Del Monte Limited & another (Environment and Land Constitutional Petition E003 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 1409 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
9 March 2026
1,402 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court in Murang'a dismissed a bid to protect land claimed for public use because the petitioner could not prove such public amenities existed.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling by the Environment and Land Court at Murang'a (M.N. Gicheru J) on the Petitioner's notice of motion dated 30-6-2025 in a constitutional petition brought under Articles 19, 20, 21, 22 and 258 of the Constitution. The Petitioner, a director of a company, sought two residual prayers: a temporary conservatory order restraining the Respondents from alienating, appropriating, subdividing, fencing off or interfering with parcels of L.R. No. 12157/2 demarcated and used for public utilities and social amenities (schools, churches, mosques and sports grounds), and any other orders the Court deemed fit. The Petitioner argued that the 1st Respondent's leasehold required it to provide land for schools and amenities, that such land is public land under Article 62, and that continued private leasehold registration violated constitutional provisions on land management, public trust and socio-economic rights. The 1st Respondent opposed, contending the issue concerning Pioneer Girls School was res judicata following a judgment in Nairobi ELC Case No. 1245 of 2015 ordering the school to vacate by 10-12-2025; that there are no public schools or amenities on the suit land, Ndula Primary and Secondary Schools being on L.R. No. 12158/5 in Kiambu County; that Pioneer Girls School is private; and that it had already excised and ceded numerous parcels for public use. The Court found that the Petitioner failed to attach the lease conditions evidencing provision for public use, failed to counter the sworn deposition that no public amenities exist on the suit land, and failed to prove Pioneer Girls School is a public institution. Applying the Munya vs Kithinji test, it held no prima facie case, arguable case with merit or public interest was established. The motion was dismissed with costs in the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Petitioner met the test for conservatory orders

Holding

The test was not met; no prima facie case, no proof of violation of constitutional values, and public interest was not demonstrated

Reasoning

The Petitioner did not attach the lease containing conditions requiring provision of land for public use. It filed no supplementary material to counter the 1st Respondent's sworn deposition that there are no public amenities on the suit land and that Ndula Primary and Secondary Schools are in Kiambu County. Failure to prove Pioneer Girls School is public, when there is sworn evidence it is the only school on the suit land, compounded the failure. The court applied the Munya vs Kithinji test and dismissed the motion.

p. 4
02

Whether the suit land is public land under Article 62 of the Constitution

Holding

No evidence that the suit land is public land; the Petitioner was directed to file evidence to prove the existence of public institutions on the land

Reasoning

The court found no evidence on record that public institutions exist on the suit land. The registration of the leasehold was complete in 2022, so the Petitioner needed to prove ongoing registration of some or part of the suit land, which was absent. With no proof of public utilities on the land, there could equally be no proof of threatened interference with them.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • To obtain conservatory orders a petitioner must establish an arguable case with inherent merit, public interest and proof of violation of constitutional values
  • The burden lies on the petitioner to prove a prima facie case, and failure to respond to a respondent's unchallenged deposition on oath means the prima facie case is not made out

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The motion dated 30-6-2025 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs in the cause
Jurisdiction invoked
Articles 19, 20, 21, 22 and 258 of the Constitution; Rule 4 of the Constitution of Kenya (Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) Practice and Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Murang’a County Initiative (MCI) Company Limited v Del Monte Limited & another (Environment and Land Constitutional Petition E003 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 1409 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Petition dated 30-6-2025 (Notice of Motion dated 30-6-2025). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/1409/eng@2026-03-09

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.