Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment (appeal against the judgment in Kerugoya MCELC No. E011 of 2022)· [2026] KEELC 1401 (KLR)

Muchemi & another v Migwi (Environment and Land Appeal E038 of 2024) [2026] KEELC 1401 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
11 March 2026
4,649 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~19 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's land court can declare a family trust over land, but only the succession court can divide a deceased person's estate among beneficiaries.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a first appeal against the judgment of Hon. G.W. Kirugumi, PM, delivered on 26th June 2023 in Kerugoya MCELC No. E011 of 2022, in which the trial magistrate declared that Geofirey Migwi Muchemi (since deceased and substituted by the respondent holding letters of administration ad litem) held LR Mutira/Kaguyu/1925 in trust for his siblings, directed subdivision into eight equal portions, and ordered removal of a caution lodged by the appellants. The appellants contended that the magistrate usurped the jurisdiction of the probate court by distributing a deceased's estate and that the respondent, holding only a limited grant ad litem, lacked capacity to administer or distribute the estate. The respondent maintained that the trial court, having found a trust, could issue consequential orders and that the probate court cannot determine questions of ownership or trust. S. M. Kibunja, ELC Judge, framed three issues. The court held that the subordinate ELC had jurisdiction to determine the existence of the customary trust, a question both parties accepted, and affirmed that declaration. However, the court held that the trial court overstepped its jurisdiction by directing subdivision and registration of shares, which in substance amounted to distribution of a deceased's estate reserved to the probate court under the Law of Succession Act and Rule 41(3) of the Probate and Administration Rules; a grant ad litem confers no such powers. The appeal was allowed: the subdivision/distribution order and the order removing the caution were set aside, parties were directed to the succession/probate court, the declaration of trust was affirmed, and each party was ordered to bear their own costs in the appeal and the trial court.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction of the ELC over customary trust claims

Holding

The subordinate ELC was properly seized of jurisdiction to determine whether the deceased registered proprietor held the land in trust for his siblings.

Reasoning

Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act confers jurisdiction over all disputes relating to land, including those founded on trust. The appellants themselves invited the trial court to pronounce on the trust through their counterclaim. The Supreme Court in Isack M'Inanga Kiebia v Isaaya Theuri M'Lintari affirmed that customary trusts are proprietary interests in land enforceable through the ELC. Both parties accepted the trial court's jurisdiction on this issue.

p. 6
02

Limits of ELC jurisdiction after a declaration of trust where the registered proprietor is deceased

Holding

The trial court overstepped its jurisdiction by directing subdivision and registration of shares, which falls within the probate/succession court's purview.

Reasoning

The subdivision orders in substance and effect amounted to distribution of the suit property to beneficiaries, a preserve of the probate court under Part V of the Law of Succession Act. Subdivision, transfer and registration of beneficiaries can only be effected within a confirmed grant under Section 71. The respondent held only letters of administration ad litem, which do not confer powers to administer or distribute an estate.

p. 9
03

Duty of a first appellate court

Holding

A first appeal is by way of retrial; the court must re-evaluate the evidence afresh while making due allowance for not having seen or heard the witnesses.

Reasoning

The court invoked the classic statement in Selle & Another v Associated Motor Boat Co. Ltd & Others, adopting the principle that an appellate court is not bound by the findings of fact of the court below and must reconsider, evaluate and draw its own conclusions from the evidence.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • Customary trusts are proprietary interests in land enforceable through the Environment and Land Court, which has jurisdiction to declare their existence.
  • The ELC's jurisdiction ends at the declaration of proprietary interests; administration, apportionment and vesting of interests among beneficiaries is reserved to the probate/succession court.
  • A holder of a limited grant ad litem cannot administer or distribute a deceased's estate.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal is allowed.
  2. 2.The learned trial magistrate's order directing the respondent to distribute the trust/suit property is set aside and parties directed to move to the appropriate succession/probate court for the administration and distribution of the suit/trust property.
  3. 3.The order removing the caution registered against LR Mutira/Kaguyu/1925 is set aside.
  4. 4.The learned trial magistrate's declaration of the existence of a customary trust over land parcel LR Mutira/Kaguyu/1925 is affirmed.
  5. 5.Each party is to bear their own costs in this appeal and the trial court.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 27
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 162(2)(b)
  • Environment and Land Court Act, 2011Section 13, Section 13(2)
  • Law of Succession Act, Chapter 160, Laws of KenyaSections 54, 71, 79, 82, 83; Part V
  • Probate and Administration RulesRule 41(3)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder XXXVI, Rule 1

Cases cited (5)

  • Re Estate of Helena Wangechi Njoroge (Deceased)
    [2015] eKLR
  • In Re Estate of Alice Mumbua Mutua (Deceased)
    [2017] KEHC 8289
  • In the Matter of the Estate of Mbai Wainaina (Deceased) (Succession Cause No. 864 of 1996)
    [2015] KEHC 6978 (KLR) (Family)
  • Selle & Another versus Associated Motor Boat Co. Ltd & Others
    [1968] EA 123
  • Isack M'Inanga Kiebia versus Isaaya Theuri M'Lintari & Another
    [2018] eKLR
On appeal from
Principal Magistrate's Court, Kerugoya (Environment and Land Court)
Kerugoya MCELC No. E011 of 2022
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution read with Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act, 2011; first appellate jurisdiction over the subordinate ELC

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Muchemi & another v Migwi (Environment and Land Appeal E038 of 2024) [2026] KEELC 1401 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Not stated in the judgment (appeal against the judgment in Kerugoya MCELC No. E011 of 2022). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/1401/eng@2026-03-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.