Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedNot stated in judgment· [2026] KEELC 1352 (KLR)

Ondu v Ogutu & another (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E002 of 2022) [2026] KEELC 1352 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
5 March 2026
379 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan land court paused enforcement of a land transfer judgment pending appeal, but only after the applicant deposited Kshs 200,000 security within 45 days.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Kisumu (E. Asati, J) on a Notice of Motion dated 24th November 2025, expressed to be brought under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules and sections 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, seeking stay of execution of the court's judgment dated 27th October 2025 pending an appeal to the Court of Appeal. The underlying judgment had directed the applicant to transfer suit lands to the respondents, with execution possible at the expiry of 90 days granted by the court. The applicant contended that execution would render the appeal nugatory, and annexed a Notice of Appeal evidencing that the appeal process had commenced. The respondents, though served on 8th December 2025 as proved by an Affidavit of Service sworn by Bruce O. Odeny Advocate, filed no response and did not attend the hearing on 27th February 2026. Counsel urged the court to allow the unopposed application. The court allowed the application, granting stay of execution of the judgment dated 27th October 2025 pending hearing and determination of the appeal to the Court of Appeal, on condition that the applicant deposits Kshs 200,000/- in court as security pursuant to Order 42 Rule 2 (b) of the Civil Procedure Rules within 45 days, failing which the stay lapses. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs of the application. The ruling was signed at Kisumu and read virtually on 5th March 2026.

Key legal issues

#
01

Entitlement to stay of execution pending appeal

Holding

The court granted stay of execution of its judgment dated 27th October 2025 pending the appeal to the Court of Appeal, conditional on the applicant depositing Kshs 200,000/- in court as security within 45 days, failing which the stay lapses.

Reasoning

The application was brought under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules and sections 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act. The applicant annexed a Notice of Appeal showing the appeal process had commenced, and averred that the judgment directing transfer of suit lands could be executed after expiry of 90 days, rendering the appeal nugatory. The respondents were served but did not respond or attend, leaving the application unopposed.

p. 1
02

Effect of non-opposition to the application

Holding

The unopposed nature of the application, combined with service on the respondents, supported allowing it as prayed with conditions.

Reasoning

Service was proved by an Affidavit of Service sworn by Bruce O. Odeny Advocate showing the respondents received the application and directions on 8th December 2025. They filed no response and did not attend the hearing on 27th February 2026. Counsel for the applicant urged the court to allow the application as unopposed, and the court allowed it on conditions as to security.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • An unopposed application for stay of execution may be allowed where the applicant demonstrates commencement of the appeal process, with security as a condition

Court orders

#
  1. 1.An order of stay of execution of the judgment dated 27th October 2025 granted pending the hearing and determination of the appeal to the Court of Appeal, on condition that the applicant deposits in court Kshs 200,000/- as security pursuant to Order 42 Rule 2 (b) Civil Procedure Rules within 45 days, failing which the stay order shall lapse
  2. 2.Each party to bear its own costs of the application
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 and sections 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ondu v Ogutu & another (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E002 of 2022) [2026] KEELC 1352 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/1352/eng@2026-03-05

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.