Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedEnvironment and Land Case 316 of 2014· [2026] KEELC 1181 (KLR)

Garissa Mattresses Limited v Wamwandu & 5 others (Environment and Land Case 316 of 2014) (20 February 2026) (Directions) [2026] KEELC 1181 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
20 February 2026
1,274 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court confirmed that a defective notice of motion can be corrected, allowing the applicants to fix clerical errors without restarting their case.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a directions/ruling decision of the Environment and Land Court at Mombasa (Ombwayo J) in a suit filed in 2014. The defendants moved the court under Sections 1A, 1B, 3A, 99 and 100 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 8 Rules 5 and Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010, seeking to arrest, stay or suspend delivery of a ruling on a Notice of Motion dated 3rd March 2025, and for leave to amend that Notice of Motion nunc pro tunc to correct clerical errors, inadvertent omissions and mistakes apparent on the face of the record - particularly the omission of the word 'stay' in prayer iii, which rendered the application vague. The application was supported by the affidavit of Joyce Chesaro, advocate. Counsel for the applicant argued that Section 100 permits correction of clerical mistakes at any stage, invoking Article 159 of the Constitution and the Oxygen Principle. Counsel for the respondent (Mr Oluga) opposed, relying on a decision of Sifuna J in Jaribu Credit that a notice of motion is not a pleading and cannot be amended. The court agreed that a notice of motion is not a pleading, but held that it can be amended as a proceeding before the court. It applied the Court of Appeal's decision in Peter M. Echaria v Priscilla N. Echaria, Havelock J's ruling in Fredrick Mwangi Nyaga v Garam Investments, and Omondi J's decision in Samwel Barkoiyet Kangogo v Daniel Ndung'u. Finding no prejudice demonstrated by the respondent, the court granted leave to amend the Notice of Motion dated 3rd March 2025, to be filed within 2 days, with costs to be costs in the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a notice of motion can be amended

Holding

A notice of motion is not a pleading and cannot be amended as a pleading, but it can be amended as a proceeding before the court under Sections 3A, 100 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 8 Rule 5.

Reasoning

The court accepted Mr Oluga's submission that a notice of motion is not a pleading, but agreed with counsel for the applicant that it may be amended as a proceeding. It was persuaded by the Court of Appeal's decision in Echaria v Echaria granting leave to amend a defective notice of motion, and by Havelock J's holding in Fredrick Mwangi Nyaga v Garam Investments that a Notice of Motion is part of the proceedings of a suit and amendable under Order 8 Rule 5 and Section 100.

p. 2
02

Whether the amendment should be denied for any reasonable cause

Holding

The amendment was granted because the respondent demonstrated no prejudice.

Reasoning

Having found jurisdiction to allow the amendment under Sections 3A, 100 and Order 8 Rule 5, the court turned to whether any reasonable cause existed to refuse it. The court noted the errors were clerical and apparent on the face of the record, including the omission of the word 'stay' in prayer iii, and that the respondent had not demonstrated any prejudice that would be suffered if the amendment were granted.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A notice of motion is not a pleading but is part of the proceedings of a suit and may be amended as a proceeding under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 8 Rule 5.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Leave granted to amend the Notice of Motion dated 3rd March 2025 nunc pro tunc
  2. 2.The amended Notice of Motion to be filed within 2 days
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 1A, 1B, 3A, 99 and 100 of the Civil Procedure Act, Cap 21; Order 8 Rule 5 and Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Garissa Mattresses Limited v Wamwandu & 5 others (Environment and Land Case 316 of 2014)  (20 February 2026) (Directions) [2026] KEELC 1181 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Environment and Land Case 316 of 2014. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/1181/eng@2026-02-20

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.