Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedApplication dated 17/9/2025 (arising from CMELC No. 359 of 2018, Nyahururu)· [2026] KEELC 1082 (KLR)

Ngigi & 3 others v Githiomi (Environment and Land Appeal E025 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 1082 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
26 February 2026
932 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court in Nyandarua refused four litigants permission to appeal a 2022 land judgment, ruling you cannot chase review after choosing an appeal.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was an application dated 17/9/2025 by the Appellants (Defendants in the lower court) seeking stay of execution of a judgment delivered on 17/3/2022 by Honourable Charles Obulutsa, CM, Nyahururu, in CMELC No. 359 of 2018, and leave to appeal out of time. The judgment below ordered eviction from plots NYANDARUA/SABUGO/1751 and 7752, general damages of Kshs. 300,000 for trespass, a permanent injunction, and costs plus interest. The Applicants attributed the delay to a pending post-judgment Review application concluded only in 2025, and asserted an arguable appeal. The Respondent opposed, showing the Applicants had earlier filed an appeal (Nyandarua ELCA No. E007 of 2023) that was dismissed for non-prosecution and then withdrawn; a similar application dated 30/4/2025 was dismissed on 3/9/2025; execution had commenced through Tango Auctioneers. The court, Mugo Kamau J, applied Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Act and held that by filing a memorandum of Appeal on 5/4/2023 the Applicants had elected Appeal over Review; the Review should not have been entertained, and having had it dismissed they could not turn to a fresh extension of time to Appeal. Leave was refused, rendering a stay of execution unviable as there was no intended Appeal. The court deplored the Applicants' successive applications, observing there must be an end to litigation. The application was dismissed with costs to the Respondent, with the court advising the Applicants to bring the matter to an end unless they proceed to a higher court.

Key legal issues

#
01

Election between Appeal and Review

Holding

Filing a memorandum of Appeal demonstrates a preference for Appeal, precluding Review; a dismissed Review cannot be followed by a fresh attempt to Appeal out of time

Reasoning

The court applied Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Act, which permits review by a person aggrieved by a decree or order. However, the Applicants had already filed a memorandum of Appeal on 5/4/2023 and a prior appeal (Nyandarua ELCA No. E007 of 2023) which was dismissed and then withdrawn. Having elected Appeal, their Review application ought not to have been entertained, and its dismissal on 26/3/2025 could not open the door to a fresh extension of time to Appeal.

p. 2
02

Stay of execution pending intended Appeal

Holding

Stay of execution cannot stand where there is no viable intended Appeal

Reasoning

Because the extension of time to Appeal was refused, there was no intended Appeal on the way to which a stay could attach. The Respondent had already commenced execution through Tango Auctioneers, and prior similar applications had been dismissed, including one dated 30/4/2025 dismissed on 3/9/2025. Granting a stay would merely perpetuate delay in a matter the court considered long overdue for conclusion.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A party who prefers an Appeal by filing a memorandum of Appeal cannot simultaneously or subsequently pursue a Review of the same judgment; the two remedies are mutually exclusive
  • There must be an end to litigation; successive applications abuse the court process

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Application dated 17/9/2025 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the Application awarded to the Respondent

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSection 80
On appeal from
Chief Magistrate's Court, Nyahururu
CMELC No. 359 of 2018
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Act (review) and inherent jurisdiction over stay of execution and extension of time to appeal

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ngigi & 3 others v Githiomi (Environment and Land Appeal E025 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 1082 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Application dated 17/9/2025 (arising from CMELC No. 359 of 2018, Nyahururu). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/1082/eng@2026-02-26

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.