Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCOtherNot stated in the judgment· [2026] KEELC 964 (KLR)

Odhoch & another v Ouko alias Mouray & another (Environment and Land Case Civil Suit E011 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 964 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
20 February 2026
1,294 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The defendants filed a notice of preliminary objection dated 21 November 2025 contending that the Environment and Land Court at Siaya lacked jurisdiction because the land subject matter of the suit was valued at Kshs 1,400,000, below the court's pecuniary threshold of Kshs 20,000,000. The plaintiff opposed through grounds of opposition and a replying affidavit, arguing the court was properly seized of the matter under Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act, 2011, and that the objection was an abuse of process. The 1st defendant's submissions filed out of time without leave were not considered. The court framed one issue: whether the preliminary objection was merited. Relying on the M.V. Lillians v Caltex Oil principle that jurisdiction is everything, the court traced the ELC's jurisdiction to Article 162(2)(b) and Section 13 of the ELC Act, conferring original and unlimited jurisdiction over land disputes, and held that gazettements under Section 26(3) and (4) of the ELC Act granting magistrates jurisdiction over land matters did not oust the ELC's jurisdiction. However, noting the claim was for specific performance of an agreement for sale of land valued at Kshs 1.4 million with no complexity, the court invoked Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act and, in the interest of justice, transferred the suit to the Chief Magistrates Court at Bondo for trial and disposition rather than striking it out. It made no orders as to costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Environment and Land Court is ousted of jurisdiction by gazetted magistrates' jurisdiction over low-value land matters

Holding

No; the ELC retains original and unlimited jurisdiction over land disputes, but a suit whose value falls below its pecuniary threshold should be transferred to the magistrates' court rather than struck out.

Reasoning

The court traced the ELC's jurisdiction to Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and Section 13 of the ELC Act, conferring original and unlimited jurisdiction. Section 26(3) and (4) of the ELC Act and Section 9(a) of the Magistrates' Courts Act allow gazetted magistrates to handle land matters within pecuniary limits, but those gazettements do not oust the ELC's jurisdiction. Since the suit sought specific performance of a sale agreement over land valued at Kshs 1.4 million with no complexity, the court exercised its power under Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act to transfer the suit to the Chief Magistrates Court at Bondo.

p. 3
02

Whether the preliminary objection was merited

Holding

Partly: the court declined to strike out the suit for want of jurisdiction but transferred it to the magistrates' court.

Reasoning

Applying the Owners of the Motor Vehicle M.V. Lillians v Caltex Oil (Kenya) Ltd principle that jurisdiction is everything, the court found it was clothed with jurisdiction since the ELC is a court of equal status to the High Court with original and unlimited jurisdiction. Nonetheless, it held that low-value land suits ought to be filed in the lower court, and using Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act, transferred the suit to the Chief Magistrates Court at Bondo with no order as to costs.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Jurisdiction is everything and a court without jurisdiction cannot take any valid step
  • The ELC has original and unlimited jurisdiction over environment and land disputes notwithstanding gazetted magistrates' jurisdiction; where value is below its pecuniary jurisdiction the proper course is transfer, not striking out

Court orders

#
  1. 1.That the suit herein is hereby transferred to the Chief Magistrates Court at Bondo for trial and disposition.
  2. 2.There shall be no orders as to costs.
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act, 2011

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Odhoch & another v Ouko alias Mouray & another (Environment and Land Case Civil Suit E011 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 964 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/964/eng@2026-02-20

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.