Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedNotice of Motion dated 22nd April 2025 (ELC at Kwale)· [2026] KEELC 616 (KLR)

Schiering v Said & 2 others (Environment and Land Case 144 of 2021) [2026] KEELC 616 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
29 January 2026
1,707 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court clarified that a 2015 land sale debt of Euros 122,000 must be converted at Kshs 108 per Euro, not today's rate.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Kwale (L.L Naikuni, J) determined an unopposed Notice of Motion dated 22nd April 2025 brought by Nereah Michael Said, the 1st Defendant, seeking clarification of the exchange rate of the Euro against the Kenya Shilling applicable to the court's judgment delivered on 12th April 2024. That judgment had directed the Applicant to remit to the Plaintiff the purchase price of Euros 122,000 less 12% at the applicable exchange rate at the time of the sale, which occurred in 2015, but did not specify the rate. In a further affidavit, the Applicant exhibited CBK rate extracts showing an average rate of 1 Euro to Kshs 108 at the time of the agreement for sale of plot 2460. Counsel relied on authority establishing that the functus officio doctrine does not bar a court from clarifying an ambiguous judgment, citing the Supreme Court's ruling in Raila Amolo Odinga v IEBC and Siaya County Assembly Services Board v Olwero. Framing two issues - whether a case was made for the orders sought and who bears the costs - the court found the application meritorious, the evidence adequate and the application unopposed. It specified the rate as 1 Euro to Kshs 108, gave the Applicant thirty days to remit the decretal amount, and directed each party to bear its own costs in light of the non-opposition. Ruling delivered virtually on 29th January 2026.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the court should clarify the exchange rate of Euro against the Kenya Shillings applicable to the judgment delivered on 12th April 2024

Holding

The court allowed the application and specified the applicable exchange rate as 1 Euro to Kshs. 108, being the average CBK rate at the time of the 2015 sale.

Reasoning

The court noted that its earlier judgment of 12th April 2024 ordered the Applicant to remit Euros 122,000 less 12% at the applicable exchange rate at the time of the sale, but never specified the rate. From the annexure to the Applicant's further affidavit sworn on 11th August 2025, the average rate was 1 EUR to Kshs 108. The application was unopposed and adequate evidence had been tendered, so the court found no reason to refuse the clarification.

p. 4
02

Who bears the costs of the application

Holding

Although the Applicant was entitled to costs, the court ordered each party to bear its own costs because the application was unopposed.

Reasoning

Costs are discretionary and, under Section 27(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, follow the event. Having successfully established her case, the Applicant would ordinarily be entitled to costs. However, since the application was never opposed, the court considered it fair and logical that each party bear their own costs.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • The power of clarification may be exercised where a judgment is ambiguous, unclear or confusing, to render the judgment more comprehensible without re-engaging with its merits.
  • Costs follow the event under Section 27(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, but the court may direct each party to bear its own costs where the application is unopposed.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion application dated 22nd April 2025 by the 1st Defendant/Applicant be and is hereby found to be meritorious thus allowed
  2. 2.The 1st Defendant/Applicant shall remit the purchase price of Euros 122,000 to the Plaintiff less 12% at the applicable exchange rate at the time of the sale, which was 1 EURO to Kshs. 108, within the next thirty (30) days from the date of delivery of the Ruling
  3. 3.Each party to bear its own costs
On appeal from
Court of Appeal
Civil Case No. 076 of 2024
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 159(2)(d) and Article 50(1) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010; Sections 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, Cap. 21; Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Schiering v Said & 2 others (Environment and Land Case 144 of 2021) [2026] KEELC 616 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Notice of Motion dated 22nd April 2025 (ELC at Kwale). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/616/eng@2026-01-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.