Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCStruck OutNotice of Motion dated 24th November 2024 (case number not stated in judgment)· [2026] KEELC 563 (KLR)

Magara v Embakasi Ranching Company & 2 others (Environment and Land Appeal E088 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 563 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
5 February 2026
1,361 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court refused to pause a lower court employment case, ruling that stopping proceedings is a drastic step requiring strong justification.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The applicant moved the court by notice of motion dated 24th November 2024 seeking stay of proceedings in Milimani Chief Magistrate's Court MCELRC No. E1604 of 2020 pending inter partes hearing and pending determination of his appeal from the ruling of Hon. Lucy Njora, Senior Principal Magistrate, delivered on 31st July 2024. That ruling had dismissed the applicant's application dated 16th October 2023 seeking leave to amend the plaint to attach a valuation report as new evidence. The 2nd respondent opposed through a replying affidavit sworn 1st October 2025, describing the application as an abuse of process and forum shopping, the applicant having filed a similar application in the lower court, and as a device to delay the matter. The applicant relied on Wilson Waweru v Robert Bor and Lucas Onyango, arguing his appeal had high chances of success and that continuation of the lower court matter could render the appeal nugatory if judgment were entered. Framing one issue - whether stay was warranted - the court applied the principles in Global Tours & Travels Limited (Ringera J) and Kenya Wildlife Services v Jane Mutembi (Gikonyo J), holding that stay of proceedings is a grave judicial action impinging on access to justice and the test is high and stringent. The court noted the trial magistrate had found no reasonable explanation for the omission of the valuation report, and the applicant's own affidavit attributed the omission to his advocate's unintentional oversight. Agreeing there was no justifiable reason to warrant the amendment or a stay, the court struck out the application dated 24th November 2024 with no order as to costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether stay of proceedings in the lower court pending appeal was warranted

Holding

Stay was refused and the application struck out; the applicant gave no justifiable basis for the stay and the amendment he sought to resurrect was properly disallowed by the trial magistrate

Reasoning

The court applied the Global Tours & Travels criteria and the Kenya Wildlife Services test that stay of proceedings is a grave step impinging on access to justice, requiring a high and stringent test. The applicant argued the lower court might render the appeal nugatory, but the 2nd respondent showed the amendment issue had already been addressed below and that a similar application had been filed in the lower court (forum shopping). The applicant's own affidavit offered only an unintentional omission by his advocate to explain the missing valuation report, which the court held insufficient.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Whether to grant a stay of proceedings is a matter of judicial discretion exercised in the interest of justice, weighing factors such as expeditious disposal, arguability of the intended appeal, judicial time and expedition of the application
  • Stay of proceedings is a grave judicial action impinging on access to justice, and the test for granting it is high and stringent

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated 24th November 2024 is therefore struck out with no order as to costs
On appeal from
Milimani Chief Magistrate's Court (Employment and Labour Relations)
MCELRC NO. E1604 of 2020
Jurisdiction invoked
Appellate/supervisory jurisdiction over the Magistrates' Court (statutory provision not expressly cited in the judgment)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Magara v Embakasi Ranching Company & 2 others (Environment and Land Appeal E088 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 563 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Notice of Motion dated 24th November 2024 (case number not stated in judgment). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/563/eng@2026-02-05

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.