Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment (Notice of Motion dated 16/07/2025)· [2026] KEELC 401 (KLR)

Bruce Odeny & Co. Advocates v Alila & another (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 016 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 401 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
29 January 2026
957 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Siaya court converted an advocate's taxed fee certificate of Kshs. 160,259.80 into an enforceable judgment because the client never challenged it.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Siaya (A. E. Dena, J) determined a Notice of Motion dated 16/07/2025 brought under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act by an advocate who had represented the respondent in Siaya CM ELC No. E25 of 2022 and sought to recover legal fees. The applicant's advocate-client bill of costs dated 18/02/2025 was taxed on 20/06/2025 by Hon Mkala, Deputy Registrar, at Kshs. 160,259.80/=, with a certificate of taxation issued on 24/06/2025. The application sought conversion of that certificate into a decree and judgment of the court. The respondent, though served and present in court on 15/10/2025, did not file a response or submissions, and the court noted he squandered the opportunity to state his position on the costs. Relying on Section 51(2), which renders a taxing officer's certificate final unless set aside or altered and permits entry of judgment where the retainer is not disputed, the court found nothing before it showing the amount was disputed or the certificate set aside. The court applied the decision in Republic v City Council of Nairobi (Exparte Inderpal Singh & 2 others) (2021) eKLR, which restated that judgment may be entered on a certificate of costs unless it is set aside, altered, or the retainer is in issue. The court allowed the application as prayed but made no order as to costs on the application.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether judgment can be entered on the certificate of taxation under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act

Holding

Yes. The certificate of taxation dated 24/06/2025 has not been challenged, set aside or altered, and nothing before the court shows the amount is disputed or that the retainer is in issue; judgment may therefore be entered for the certified sum.

Reasoning

Section 51(2) provides that the taxing officer's certificate is final as to the amount covered unless set aside or altered by the court, and empowers entry of judgment where the retainer is not disputed. The respondent was served, appeared, and was given an opportunity to respond in writing but did not. The taxing master's ruling of 20/06/2025 and the certificate of taxation are on record and unchallenged. Following Republic v City Council of Nairobi (Exparte Inderpal Singh), the court found no impediment to entering judgment on the taxed costs.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A certificate of taxation is final as to the amount covered thereby unless set aside or altered by the court, and where the retainer is not disputed the court may enter judgment for the sum certified (s.51(2) Advocates Act).

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion application dated 16th July 2025 is allowed as prayed, with the certificate of costs taxed at Kshs. 160,259.80/= converted into a decree and judgment of the court
  2. 2.No orders as to costs on the application
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act (Cap 16)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Bruce Odeny & Co. Advocates v Alila & another (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 016 of 2025) [2026] KEELC 401 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Not stated in the judgment (Notice of Motion dated 16/07/2025). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/401/eng@2026-01-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.