Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCStruck OutPetition dated 14th June 2021, amended 14th February 2023· [2025] KEELC 8635 (KLR)

Anjarwalla and another (As Executors of the Estate of Saifuddin Karimbhai Anjarwalla) & 2 others v Attorney General & 3 others; Molu (Interested Party) (Environment and Land Petition 34 of 2021) [2025] KEELC 8635 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
11 December 2025
3,246 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~13 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court struck out a constitutional petition over expired Mombasa leasehold land, ruling such ownership disputes belong in ordinary civil suits.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Petitioners, executors of three deceased co-owners and co-owners in common of Mombasa/Block XXI/469 (approx. 7.24 acres, a subdivision of Mombasa/Block XXI/261), petitioned over the property's 99-year lease to the Government of Kenya commencing 28th February 1906, which expired on 27th February 2005 without renewal. They alleged that in 2017 the Government issued a 99-year lease over the property to Sunni Muslim Community Registered Trustee, and sought declarations of violations of Articles 40, 60(1), 47 and 50(1) of the Constitution, Articles 14 and 17 of the African Charter and UDHR, nullity of the alienation, special damages of Kshs 1,013,600,000, general damages, interest and costs. The Respondents (the Attorney General, Chief Land Registrar, Ministry of Lands and County Government of Mombasa) raised a Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 15th January 2025 on sub judice, res judicata and constitutional avoidance, relying on the pending Mombasa ELC Case No. 180 of 2013 and withdrawn ELC Case No. 26 of 2014. The court found the sub judice/res judicata limbs unproven, no pleadings or judgments from the earlier suits having been produced. However, it upheld the constitutional avoidance objection, holding that the dispute over ownership of the suit property was an ordinary civil claim within the court's jurisdiction under Article 162(2)(b) and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act. The Amended Petition was struck out, with each party bearing their own costs. Judgment delivered on 11th December 2025 by J.O. Olola, J, in Mombasa.

Key legal issues

#
01

Sub judice and res judicata

Holding

The Preliminary Objection on sub judice and res judicata failed because the Respondents did not avail evidence of the pleadings or judgment in the earlier suits

Reasoning

Although PW2 admitted the existence of the earlier 2013 suit, the Respondents produced no pleadings to show the parties were the same or that the previous dispute concerned the constitutional violations now pleaded. No judgment or order from the earlier suits was produced from which it could be inferred the issues were heard and finally determined.

p. 6
02

Constitutional avoidance

Holding

The Petition offended the constitutional avoidance principle and was struck out

Reasoning

The dispute solely revolved around proprietorship of the suit property and alleged issuance of title deeds to third parties, an ordinary civil claim within the court's ordinary civil jurisdiction under Article 162(2)(b) and Section 13 of the ELC Act. The Petitioners themselves had filed an ordinary civil claim in the earlier pending suit, showing they knew this route was available.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • A land dispute that can be resolved by a court in the exercise of its ordinary civil jurisdiction should not be brought as a constitutional petition, per the doctrine of constitutional avoidance
  • A party invoking res judicata must produce the pleadings or judgment in the earlier suit to establish identity of parties and issues

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Amended Petition dated 14th February 2023 is struck out
  2. 2.Each party shall bear their own costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Anjarwalla and another (As Executors of the Estate of Saifuddin Karimbhai Anjarwalla) & 2 others v Attorney General & 3 others; Molu (Interested Party) (Environment and Land Petition 34 of 2021) [2025] KEELC 8635 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Petition dated 14th June 2021, amended 14th February 2023. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/8635/eng@2025-12-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.