Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedELC Case at Mombasa (notice of motion dated 17th June 2025)· [2025] KEELC 8616 (KLR)

Bamaftah & another v Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Lands, Public Works, Housing and Urban Development & 7 others (Environment and Planning Civil Case E004 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 8616 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
10 December 2025
1,273 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The 1st to 6th and 8th defendants, through the Attorney General, moved the court by notice of motion dated 17th June 2025 seeking transfer of this suit to ELC Malindi so it could be heard alongside Malindi ELC Petition No. E001 of 2024 (Kabibi Karisa Charo & 7 Others v NLC & 5 Others) and Malindi ELC Petition No. E020 of 2023 (Stephen Kahindi Charo & 9 Others v Ministry of Lands & Others). The applicants deposed that all three matters concern parcels MN/111/324 and 334 and the legality of their subdivision and allocation. The plaintiffs opposed, asserting that their suit property, Subdivision No. 4730 (original No. 527/2) Section 111 Mainland North, CR No. 38340, is distinct; that parties and subject matter differ; and that the Malindi petitions are partly heard, so consolidation would cause confusion and delay. S. M. Kibunja, J framed three issues: similarity of subject matter, whether transfer was warranted to avoid conflicting decisions, and costs. Relying on section 12 of the Civil Procedure Act, the court held that although the plaintiff's parcel is distinct on title, it is traceable in ancestry to MN/111/324 and 334, whose legality is under challenge at Malindi. To avoid two courts of concurrent jurisdiction reaching different decisions on title to the same or related land, the application was allowed in terms of prayer (1) and the suit transferred to ELC Malindi. Costs were ordered to abide the outcome of the suit, the applicants being public offices.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the suit property here is the same subject matter as in the Malindi petitions

Holding

The suit property is traceable in ancestry to MN/111/324 & 334, the subject of the two Malindi petitions, making transfer appropriate.

Reasoning

From the pleadings, depositions and submissions, the court found that although the plaintiffs' property (Subdivision No. 4730, original No. 527/2) differs on the face of the title, it was carved out of parcel 527 which arose from amalgamated and subdivided parcels MN/111/324 and 334. The Malindi petitions challenge the legality of those subdivisions and subsequent allocations, so the subject matters are related.

p. 3
02

Whether the suit should be transferred to ELC Malindi

Holding

Transfer granted to avoid conflicting decisions by courts with concurrent jurisdiction over the same land.

Reasoning

Section 12 of the Civil Procedure Act grounds jurisdiction in the location of immovable property; both courts have concurrent jurisdiction. Given the risk of two courts reaching different decisions on the legality of title to the same or related land, the court exercised its discretion in favour of transfer to ELC Malindi where the two petitions are already partly heard.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Where a suit property is an offshoot of or related to property that is the subject of pending litigation in another court of concurrent jurisdiction, transfer is warranted to avoid conflicting decisions.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application is allowed in terms of prayer (1)
  2. 2.This suit is transferred to ELC Malindi for hearing and determination
  3. 3.Costs in the application to abide the outcome of the suit

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSection 12
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 27

Cases cited (2)

  • Kabibi Karisa Charo & 7 Others versus NLC & 5 Others
    Malindi ELC Petition No. E001 of 2024
  • Stephen Kahindi Charo & 9 Others versus Ministry of Lands & Others
    Malindi ELC Petition No. E020 of 2023
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 12 of the Civil Procedure Act (Cap 21); inherent powers on transfer of suits

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Bamaftah & another v Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Lands, Public Works, Housing and Urban Development & 7 others (Environment and Planning Civil Case E004 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 8616 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). ELC Case at Mombasa (notice of motion dated 17th June 2025). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/8616/eng@2025-12-10

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.