Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedJudicial Review Application (Notice of Motion dated 14/05/2025)· [2025] KEELC 8574 (KLR)

Presbyterian Church of East Africa (Uthiru Church) v County Lands Registrar, Kiambu County (Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E006 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 8574 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya at Thika
4 December 2025
2,349 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The High Court ordered the Kiambu Land Registrar to finally register PCEA Uthiru Church as owner of disputed land and issue its title deed, three years after the Court of Appeal's ruling.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Ex Parte Applicant, Presbyterian Church of East Africa (Uthiru Church), moved the High Court by Notice of Motion dated 14/05/2025 under the Law Reform Act, the Fair Administrative Action Act and Order 53 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules, seeking orders of mandamus compelling the County Land Registrar, Kiambu County to comply with the Judgment and Decree of the Court of Appeal in Civil Appeal 303 of 2018 delivered on 4/02/2022, which set aside the trial judgment, allowed the Applicant's counterclaim, and entitled it to registration as proprietor of Land Reference Dagoretti/Uthiru/T.382. The Applicant complained that despite service of the decree and a Notice of Intention to sue, the Registrar had failed, neglected or refused for over three years to rectify the register and issue a title deed, violating its rights to property and fair administrative action under Articles 40 and 47. The application was unopposed. The court set out the parameters of mandamus from the Gathenji decision, holding that mandamus compels performance of statutory public duties where the duty-bearer fails or refuses to perform them to the detriment of a party with a legal right to performance. It further held that Article 47 and the Fair Administrative Action Act oblige a Land Registrar to act lawfully, fairly, reasonably and expeditiously, with the Registrar's delay breaching those principles. Satisfied that the Applicant had a legitimate expectation to enjoy the fruits of the judgment, the court granted mandamus in terms of prayers (1) and (2), compelling registration, rectification of the register and issuance of a title deed, and awarded costs to the Applicant. Judgment delivered virtually at Thika on 4/12/2025 by Mogeni J.

Key legal issues

#
01

Scope of mandamus in judicial review

Holding

Mandamus lies to compel performance of a statutory public duty where the duty-bearer has failed or refused to perform it to the detriment of a party with a legal right to its performance

Reasoning

The court adopted the Court of Appeal's parameters in Republic v Kenya National Examinations Council Ex parte Gathenji, that mandamus is of extensive remedial nature, commands no more than the party is legally bound to perform, and compels performance of statutory public duties. It cannot quash decisions already made; only certiorari can. The Registrar's statutory duty to register and rectify the register fitted these parameters.

p. 3
02

Land Registrar's duty of fair administrative action

Holding

A Land Registrar's actions are subject to Article 47 and the Fair Administrative Action Act, requiring lawfulness, procedural fairness, written reasons, reasonableness, expeditious service, accountability and subjection to judicial review

Reasoning

The court catalogued specific implications of Article 47 for a Land Registrar, including acting within jurisdiction, giving notice and hearing before adverse decisions, providing written reasons, rationality, prompt service, transparency and accountability to judicial review. The Registrar's unexplained failure to implement a binding Court of Appeal decree for over three years breached these principles, entitling the Applicant to mandamus.

p. 4
03

Enforcement of the Court of Appeal decree by mandamus

Holding

The Applicant was entitled to an order of mandamus compelling the Registrar to register it as proprietor of Dagoretti/Uthiru/T.382 and to rectify the register and issue a title deed

Reasoning

The Court of Appeal on 4/02/2022 set aside the trial judgment, dismissed the plaintiffs' suit, allowed the counterclaim and cross-appeal, entitling the Applicant to registration as proprietor. The Registrar failed, neglected or refused to implement the decree despite service and a Notice of Intention to sue. The application was unopposed, and the court found a legitimate expectation that the Applicant enjoy the fruits of the judgment.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • Mandamus compels performance of a public duty imposed by statute where the person or body on whom the duty is imposed fails or refuses to perform it to the detriment of a party with a legal right to expect performance
  • Article 47 of the Constitution, reinforced by the Fair Administrative Action Act, obligates public officers including Land Registrars to ensure their administrative actions are expeditious, efficient, lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair

Court orders

#
  1. 1.An order of mandamus compelling the County Land Registrar, Kiambu County to comply with and give effect to the Judgment and Decree of the Court of Appeal by registering the Ex Parte Applicant as the lawful and rightful owner of Land Reference Dagoretti/Uthiru/T.382
  2. 2.An order of mandamus compelling the County Land Registrar, Kiambu County to rectify the land register in respect of Land Reference Dagoretti/Uthiru/T.382 and issue a title deed to the Ex Parte Applicant
  3. 3.Costs awarded to the Ex Parte Applicant
On appeal from
null
null
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 8(2) & 9 of the Law Reform Act Cap 26, Section 3, 4, 7 & 9 of the Fair Administrative Action Act, 2015, Order 53 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Presbyterian Church of East Africa (Uthiru Church) v County Lands Registrar, Kiambu County (Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E006 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 8574 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Judicial Review Application (Notice of Motion dated 14/05/2025). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/8574/eng@2025-12-04

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.