Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedMachakos ELC Appeal dated 20/02/2023 (filed 21/02/2023)· [2025] KEELC 8456 (KLR)

Kamau v Kitana & 2 others (Environment and Land Appeal E006 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 8456 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
2 December 2025
2,109 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court confirmed you can sue to recover land more than 12 years later if fraud was involved and you recently discovered it—no special court permission needed first.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The appellant sued the respondents over land parcel Machakos Kiandani/241, alleging he purchased it from Mbithi Kituku before adjudication, took possession, and discovered in January 2022 that strangers had cleared his trees and encroached; he pleaded fraud with particulars. The first respondent filed a preliminary objection contending the suit was time-barred under Sections 4(1)(a) and 7 of the Limitation of Actions Act. The trial magistrate struck out the suit, holding that even a fraud-based claim required prior leave for extension of time under Section 26. On a first appeal under Section 78 of the Civil Procedure Act, the Environment and Land Court at Machakos (A. Y. Koross, J) considered a single consolidated ground: whether the trial magistrate erred in failing to appreciate that the claim fell within the Section 26 exceptions. The court held that Sections 22 and 26 do not envisage an application for leave; a party may file suit despite expiry of the limitation period and the court may disregard limitation where fraud or mistake is pleaded and not discovered until later. The court found the appellant had pleaded fraud in paragraph 8 of the plaint and discovered it in January 2022, filing suit in June 2022. Allowing the appeal, the court set aside the ruling of 26/01/2023, substituted it with an order dismissing the preliminary objection with costs, costs to abide the outcome of the suit.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a plaintiff invoking Section 26 of the Limitation of Actions Act (fraud/mistake) must first obtain leave to file suit out of time

Holding

No leave or formal application is required; the section empowers a party to file suit despite expiry of the limitation period, and the court may disregard the limitation period if the claim falls within Section 26.

Reasoning

The court read Sections 7 and 26 of the Limitation of Actions Act together with precedent (Nzoia Sugar) and held that Sections 22 and 26 do not envisage an application for leave. Since the appellant pleaded fraud with particulars and asserted discovery in January 2022, filing suit in June 2022, the suit was competently before the trial court and the trial court had jurisdiction.

p. 5
02

Whether the appellant pleaded fraud with particulars as required to invoke Section 26

Holding

Yes; paragraph 8 of the plaint alleged fraud and mistake with particulars under paragraphs 8(a)–8(c).

Reasoning

The first respondent argued that fraud had not been pleaded, but the court, on examining the plaint, found that the appellant alleged fraud and mistake in paragraph 8 and particularised them in 8(a)–8(c). The appellant also pleaded discovery of the fraud in January 2022, bringing the claim within the delayed-discovery exception.

p. 4
03

Whether a claim to recover land filed outside 12 years can proceed where fraud is alleged

Holding

Yes; where fraud is concealed, the limitation clock runs from discovery or when the plaintiff could with reasonable diligence have discovered the fraud.

Reasoning

Section 7 bars recovery of land after 12 years, but Section 26 provides that where the action is based on fraud, concealment of the right of action by fraud, or mistake, limitation does not begin until discovery or constructive discovery. The court adopted precedent that land can be recovered even after 12 years where fraud is involved.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Where a claimant pleads fraud or mistake not known to him, time does not begin to run until discovery, and no formal application for leave to file suit out of time under Section 26 of the Limitation of Actions Act is required before filing such a suit.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Appeal allowed with costs to the appellant
  2. 2.Ruling of the trial court delivered on 26/01/2023 set aside
  3. 3.Ruling substituted with an order dismissing the preliminary objection dated 29/06/2022, with costs, costs to abide the outcome of the suit

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Limitation of Actions Act, Cap 22Section 4(1)(a)
  • Limitation of Actions Act, Cap 22Section 7
  • Limitation of Actions Act, Cap 22Section 26
  • Limitation of Actions Act, Cap 22Section 22
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 78

Cases cited (6)

  • Selle & Another v Association Motor Boat Co. Ltd & others
    (1968) EA 123
  • Abdul Hameed Saif –Vs- Ali Mohamed Sholani
    (1955) 22 EACA 270
  • Timsales Ltd V Wilson Libuywa
    [2008] Kehc 460 (KLR)
  • Viginiah Kairigo Runji v Christopher Nthia Gucutha & 17 others
    [2020] KEELC 2036 (KLR)
  • Nzoia Sugar Company Ltd v Kenya Ports Authority
    [1990] KEHC 36 (KLR)
  • Vision Afrika Housing Co-operative Society Ltd & another v Gikonyo & another
    [2025] KEELC 379 (KLR)
On appeal from
Magistrates' Court (trial court at Machakos)
Suit over land parcel Machakos Kiandani/241, plaint dated 8/06/2022
Jurisdiction invoked
First appeal under Section 78 of the Civil Procedure Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kamau v Kitana & 2 others (Environment and Land Appeal E006 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 8456 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Machakos ELC Appeal dated 20/02/2023 (filed 21/02/2023). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/8456/eng@2025-12-02

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.