Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedELC Case E007 of 2025 (Naivasha)· [2025] KEELC 8072 (KLR)

Butu & 29 others v Delamere Estates Limited & another (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E005 of 2025) (Environment and Land) [2025] KEELC 8072 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
20 November 2025
2,591 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This Environment and Land Court ruling at Naivasha, delivered by M.C. Oundo J on 20th November 2025, determined a Notice of Motion dated 2nd July 2025 in which the Applicants sought an interim injunction restraining the Respondents from evicting them from parcels LR No. 32549 and LR No. 32550 in Gilgil. The Applicants claimed uninterrupted occupation since 1985, exceeding the 12-year limitation period for adverse possession, and relied on the Giella trinity of a prima facie case, irreparable harm and balance of convenience. The Respondents opposed through a preliminary objection and replying affidavits, contending that the suit was a nullity for failure to annex a certified extract of title as required by Order 37 Rule 7(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, and that they were not the registered owners of the suit parcels, rendering the claim misdirected. The court framed a single issue: whether the application had merit. While acknowledging Wilson Kazungu Katana on the mandatory nature of the title-extract requirement, the court held that Order 37 Rule 18, Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution and Section 19 of the ELC Act confer discretion to cure such non-compliance before trial. However, because the Applicants failed to file submissions as directed, the court dismissed the application for want of prosecution with costs, and directed the Applicants to file a Supplementary Affidavit with a certified extract of title and official search within thirty days, failing which the entire suit shall stand struck out.

Key legal issues

#
01

Mandatory requirement of a certified extract of title in adverse possession suits

Holding

Order 37 Rule 7(2) mandatorily requires annexure of a certified extract of title, but the court may excuse non-compliance prior to trial and allow the deficiency to be cured

Reasoning

The court cited Wilson Kazungu Katana, where the Court of Appeal held that failure to annex a certified extract rendered an originating summons incompetent and liable to be struck out. However, reading Order 37 Rule 7(2) together with Order 37 Rule 18, Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution and Section 19 of the ELC Act, the judge held the court has discretion to remedy non-compliance before trial in the interest of substantive justice.

p. 5
02

Consequences of failure to file submissions as ordered

Holding

An application whose submissions are not filed as directed is deemed unprosecuted and liable to dismissal for want of prosecution

Reasoning

Directions were issued for disposal by written submissions; only the Respondents complied. Relying on Rowlands Ndegwa v County Government of Nyeri citing Winnie Wanjiku Mwai, the court held that the Applicants' non-compliance demonstrated inertia, inordinate delay, and lack of interest, warranting dismissal for want of prosecution rather than determination on the merits of the injunction criteria.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • An originating summons for adverse possession must annex a certified extract of title under Order 37 Rule 7(2), but the court retains discretion to remedy non-compliance before trial in furtherance of substantive justice
  • Parties who fail to file submissions as ordered by the court are deemed to have failed to prosecute their application, which is liable for dismissal

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Applicants' Notice of Motion dated 2nd July 2025 is dismissed for want of prosecution with costs
  2. 2.The Applicants shall file and serve within thirty (30) days a Supplementary Affidavit with a certified extract of the title and official search to the suit parcel of land
  3. 3.In default of compliance the suit shall stand struck out

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Rules 2010Order 40 Rule 1
  • Civil Procedure Rules 2010Order 51 Rule 1
  • Civil Procedure Act (Cap. 21)Section 3A
  • Civil Procedure Rules 2010Order 37 Rule 7(2)
  • Civil Procedure Rules 2010Order 37 Rule 18
  • Evidence ActSection 60(o)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159(2)(d)
  • Environment and Land Court ActSection 19
  • Limitation of Actions Act

Cases cited (8)

  • Wilson Kazungu Katana & 101 others v Salim Abdalla Bakshwein & another
    [2015] KECA 728 (KLR)
  • Ndonye & 2 Others v Land Registrar Machakos & Another
  • Muthuri v Mutiga & Another
    [2022] KEELC 3506 (KLR)
  • Githi Mwangi & 4 Others
    (2005) eKLR
  • Muthuri v Mutiga & Another
    (Environment and Land Case E007 of 2021) [2023] KEELC 17075 (KLR)
  • Simon Gatutu & 587 Others v E. A Portland Cement
    [2011] eKLR
  • Rowlands Ndegwa and 4 Others vs. County Government of Nyeri and 3 Others; Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Authority & Another (Interested Parties)
    [2020] eKLR
  • Winnie Wanjiku Mwai vs. Attorney General & 3 Others
    [2016] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 40 Rule 1 & Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010; Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act (Cap. 21); Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution; Section 19 of the Environment and Land Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Butu & 29 others v Delamere Estates Limited & another (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E005 of 2025)  (Environment and Land) [2025] KEELC 8072 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). ELC Case E007 of 2025 (Naivasha). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/8072/eng@2025-11-20

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.