Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedNot stated in the judgment· [2025] KEELC 7981 (KLR)

Kamula & 2 others v Mwololo & another (Environment and Land Case 24 of 2018) [2025] KEELC 7981 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
19 November 2025
662 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court confirmed that a pending appeal does not stop a party from converting taxed costs into an enforceable judgment.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by Hon. E. O. Obaga, J, determined a notice of motion dated 28th June 2024 in which the plaintiffs/decree holders sought entry of judgment in terms of a certificate of taxation dated 19th February 2024 and issued on 5th March 2024 by the Deputy Registrar, for Kshs. 964,360/=. The bill of costs, dated 5th December 2022, had been taxed on 19th February 2024. A demand for settlement was served on the 1st defendant/judgment debtor, who failed and neglected to pay. The judgment debtor opposed the application through a replying affidavit sworn on 24th October 2025. He argued that he had lodged an appeal against the underlying judgment in Nairobi Court of Appeal E434 of 2022, that he had been granted leave on 22nd October 2025 to amend his memorandum of appeal, that he had been unprocedurally evicted from the suit premises, and that the decree holders had promised not to pursue costs once he was evicted. He contended the application was made in bad faith and should not be allowed in view of the pending appeal. Counsel elected to rely on filed affidavits without oral submissions. The court framed one issue: whether the certificate of taxation should be converted into a judgment. Applying section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the court held that an unsetting-aside certificate is final as to the amount of costs and entitles the holder to judgment for the certified sum. It found no evidence of waiver of the right to costs, and held that a pending appeal, absent a stay from the Court of Appeal, is no bar to entry of judgment. The application was allowed as prayed and judgment entered in terms of the certificate of taxation.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a certificate of taxation should be converted into a judgment notwithstanding a pending appeal

Holding

Yes; entry of judgment on a certificate of taxation is not barred by a pending appeal, especially where no stay has been issued.

Reasoning

The court found no dispute that a certificate of taxation was issued on 5th March 2024. Under section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, where the certificate has not been set aside, the court may order judgment for the certified sum. The only objections raised were the pending appeal and an alleged promise not to pursue costs, but there was no evidence of waiver of the right to costs, and no stay from the Court of Appeal was in place.

p. 2
02

Whether the judgment debtor proved waiver of the decree holders' right to costs

Holding

No; the alleged promise that costs would not be pursued after eviction was not proved.

Reasoning

The judgment debtor relied on an alleged promise by the decree holders that they would not pursue costs once he was evicted from the suit premises. The court held there was no evidence of such waiver, so the objection could not defeat the statutory entitlement to enforce the certificate of taxation.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A certificate of taxation that has not been set aside or altered by the court is final as to the amount of costs and the court may enter judgment for the sum certified, even where an appeal against the underlying judgment is pending.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered for the decree holders in terms of the certificate of taxation dated 19th February 2024 for Kshs. 964,360/= as prayed in the notice of motion dated 28th June 2024
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kamula & 2 others v Mwololo & another (Environment and Land Case 24 of 2018) [2025] KEELC 7981 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/7981/eng@2025-11-19

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.