Gitau v Kioi (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons 006 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 7942 (KLR)
The bottom line
#The Environment and Land Court refused to stop a Ngong landowner from dealing with his property because the claimant couldn't prove her ownership claim at this stage.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the Applicant met the threshold for a temporary injunction
The application was dismissed; the Applicant failed on all three Giella/Nguruman limbs.
The court found that the Applicant did not establish a prima facie case with probability of success; she was neither in possession nor the registered owner of the suit property. She also failed to show irreparable harm not compensable by damages, and the balance of convenience favoured the Respondent, who is the registered owner in occupation and has undertaken developments on the land, facts which were not rebutted.
Legal principles established
#- The existence of a constructive trust is a matter of fact that must be proved at the hearing.
Court orders
#- 1.The Notice of Motion dated 9th May 2025 is dismissed
- 2.Costs to abide the outcome of the main suit
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over land parcel LR. Ngong/Ngong/105610
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Gitau v Kioi (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons 006 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 7942 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Notice of Motion dated 9th May 2025. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/7942/eng@2025-11-13
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.