Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNot stated in judgment· [2025] KEELC 7778 (KLR)

Ndangána v Masika & another (Environment and Land Appeal E021 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 7778 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
5 November 2025
1,316 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Once you withdraw an appeal in Kenya, it takes effect immediately on service and generally cannot be reinstated, the Environment and Land Court has ruled.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a Notice of Motion dated 3rd May 2024 in which the appellant sought to expunge a notice of withdrawal of appeal filed by his former advocates, Kiveu & Company; to have Maobe Mukhwana & Company Advocates come on record; and to amend the Memorandum of Appeal. The appellant asserted the withdrawal was without his instructions and that the mistake of counsel should not be visited upon him. The respondent opposed, contending the application was defective, that the withdrawal notice took effect upon service, and that no provision allows reinstatement of a withdrawn appeal. The court framed a single issue: whether the applicant deserved the orders sought. Applying Order 25 of the Civil Procedure Rules as explained by the Court of Appeal in Beijing Industrial Designing & Research Institute v Lagoon Development Ltd, the court held that since no directions had been issued and no Record of Appeal filed, the withdrawal predated setting down and took effect upon service, whereupon the appeal stood withdrawn. The court found no legal basis cited for reinstating a withdrawn appeal and held that once withdrawn, nothing remains capable of reinstatement; the amendment prayer also failed for want of a live appeal. The presumption that the former advocates acted on instructions was not rebutted. However, under Order 9 Rule 9, leave was granted for the new firm to come on record. Save for that prayer, the application was dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Key legal issues

#
01

Effect of notice of withdrawal of appeal before setting down for hearing

Holding

Withdrawal took effect upon service and the appeal stood withdrawn; it could not be expunged or reinstated

Reasoning

Relying on Order 25 of the Civil Procedure Rules as explained in Beijing Industrial Designing, where a suit/appeal has not been set down for hearing, the withdrawing party has an absolute right to withdraw, and withdrawal takes effect upon service of the notice. No directions had been issued and no Record of Appeal filed, so the withdrawal was pre-setting down and effective on service on 15/02/2024. No law permitting reinstatement was cited.

p. 3
02

Alleged lack of instructions to former advocates

Holding

The presumption of instructions was not rebutted

Reasoning

It is trite law that instructions to an advocate are presumed to exist unless proved otherwise, per Kenya Commercial Bank v Specialized Engineering. The appellant adduced no evidence showing that Kiveu & Company acted without instructions at the point of withdrawal, so the expunging prayer failed.

p. 3
03

Change of advocates

Holding

Leave granted for Maobe Mukhwana & Company Advocates to come on record

Reasoning

Under Order 9 Rule 9 a party may change advocates after conclusion of a case with leave of court. The appellant is entitled to an advocate of choice and no impediment exists, so that prayer was allowed even though the rest of the application failed.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A withdrawal of suit or appeal made before setting down takes effect upon service of the notice of withdrawal
  • Instructions to an advocate are presumed to exist unless proved otherwise
  • Once an appeal is withdrawn there is nothing capable of being reinstated

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The firm of Maobe Mukhwana & Company Advocates granted leave to represent the appellant in place of Kiveu & Company Advocates
  2. 2.Prayer for expunging notice of withdrawal of appeal dismissed
  3. 3.Prayer for reinstatement of withdrawn appeal dismissed
  4. 4.Prayer for amendment of Memorandum of Appeal dismissed
  5. 5.Application dated 3rd May 2024 dismissed with costs to the respondent
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent jurisdiction of the Court and Civil Procedure Rules (Order 25, Order 9 Rule 9)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ndangána v Masika & another (Environment and Land Appeal E021 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 7778 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/7778/eng@2025-11-05

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.