Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedPetition dated 10.09.2024 (as amended on 18.02.2025)· [2025] KEELC 7673 (KLR)

Registered Officials and Trustees of Jesus Celebration Centre v National Environment Management Authority & 2 others; Darajani Hotel Limited & 3 others (Interested Parties) (Environment and Land Petition E020 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 7673 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya
6 November 2025
1,367 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's High Court in Mombasa refused to assign a larger judge bench to a constitutional challenge against noise regulations, meaning one judge will decide the case.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
By a petition dated 10.09.2024 and amended on 18.02.2025, the petitioners sought certification that the petition raises a substantial question of law under Article 165(4) of the Constitution concerning alleged violation of their freedom of worship by the 1st respondent's enforcement of the National Management and Coordination (Noise and Excessive Vibration Pollution Control) Regulations 2009, and whether those Regulations are inconsistent with the Constitution. Following a ruling of 10.07.2025 on a preliminary objection, the court directed parties to file submissions on certification; only the petitioners and the 1st respondent complied. The court, applying the authorities of Nkunja vs Magistrates and Judges Vetting Board, Hon. Chemutut and Peter Gichira, held that a bench under Article 165(4) should be empaneled only where strictly necessary and where a substantial or novel question of law exists that a single judge cannot competently determine. While acknowledging the petitioners' right to enjoy, practise and profess their faith, the court found the only real question was how that right balances against the rights of others and the right to a clean and healthy environment - a matter a single judge can decide, with any decision appealable to the Court of Appeal. Certification was accordingly declined, the petition was directed to be mentioned for hearing directions, the absent interested parties were to be served, and costs were reserved to the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the petition should be certified as raising a substantial question of law under Article 165(4) of the Constitution

Holding

Certification was declined; the question of balancing freedom of worship against noise control and environmental rights is not a substantial or novel question requiring a bench

Reasoning

The court applied authority establishing that something more than novelty or complexity is required for certification, and that judicial resources are scarce such that benches should only be empaneled where strictly necessary. Any decision of a single judge remains appealable to the Court of Appeal sitting as a bench. The petitioners' right to worship was not doubted; only its balancing with others' rights arose, which a single judge can decide.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Empanelling a bench under Article 165(4) is reserved for matters raising substantial or novel questions of law that a single judge cannot competently decide; single judges may determine constitutional petitions within the High Court's jurisdiction, with appeals lying to the Court of Appeal.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Prayer No. (g) of the motion dated 10.09.2024 and amended on 18.02.2025 is declined
  2. 2.The petition shall be mentioned on 18.02.2026 for directions on the hearing thereof
  3. 3.The petitioners shall serve the interested parties who are absent and file an affidavit of service
  4. 4.Costs in the cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 165(3) and (4)
  • National Management and Coordination (Noise and Excessive Vibration Pollution Control) Regulations 2009

Cases cited (6)

  • Harrison Kinyanjui vs Attorney General & Another
    [2012] eKLR
  • Seventh Day Adventist Church (East Africa) Ltd vs Minister for Education & 3 Others
    [2017] eKLR
  • Save Lamu & 5 Others vs National Environment Management Authority & Another
    [2019] eKLR
  • Nkunja vs Magistrates and Judges Vetting Board & Another (Petition 154 of 2016)
    [2016] KEHC 7269 (KLR)
  • Hon. Chemutut and 3 Others vs the Attorney General and 3 Others, Petition No. 307 of 2014
  • Peter Gichira vs The Attorney General and Others, High Court Petition No. 313 of 2015
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 165(3) and (4) of the Constitution of Kenya

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Registered Officials and Trustees of Jesus Celebration Centre v National Environment Management Authority & 2 others; Darajani Hotel Limited & 3 others (Interested Parties) (Environment and Land Petition E020 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 7673 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Petition dated 10.09.2024 (as amended on 18.02.2025). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/7673/eng@2025-11-06

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.