African Devine Church v Koech & 2 others (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E042 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 7586 (KLR)
The bottom line
#Kenya's ELC in Eldoret ruled that magistrates' courts cannot hear adverse possession cases, and a case filed in the wrong court cannot simply be transferred.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Jurisdiction of Magistrates' Courts over adverse possession claims
Magistrates' Courts lack jurisdiction to hear and determine adverse possession claims, which are the exclusive preserve of the Environment and Land Court
Section 38 of the Limitation of Actions Act requires applications by a person claiming to be entitled to land by adverse possession to be made to the High Court. Following Sugawara vs Kiruti, 'High Court' must be construed as the Environment and Land Court under Article 162(2)(b). Section 9(a) of the Magistrates' Courts Act does not include adverse possession claims. Both courts are bound by the Court of Appeal decision under stare decisis.
Whether the ELC can transfer a suit from a subordinate court that lacked jurisdiction
No - the power under Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act only permits transfer of a suit filed in a court with competent jurisdiction
Relying on Equity Bank Limited vs Bruce Mutie Mutuku and Albert Chaurembo Mumba (citing Kagenyi vs Musiramo), the court held that transfer cannot sanctify an incompetent suit. Since the only ground for the transfer was the lower court's lack of jurisdiction, and that ground was made out, no competent suit existed to transfer. The applicant's recourse is to withdraw the adverse possession claim and file afresh in the ELC.
Whether the constructive trust claim can remain in the Magistrate's Court
The lower court may hear the constructive trust claim even though it cannot entertain the adverse possession claim
The court distinguished between the two heads of claim in the plaint. While the adverse possession component is outside the Magistrates' Court's jurisdiction, the constructive trust claim falls within matters magistrates duly gazetted under the Environment and Land Court Act can handle.
Legal principles established
#- Magistrates' Courts do not have jurisdiction to determine claims of adverse possession; such claims are reserved to the Environment and Land Court
- The High Court (ELC) cannot under Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act transfer a suit filed in a court lacking jurisdiction to a court with jurisdiction
Court orders
#- 1.The Applicant's Notice of Motion dated 29th August, 2025 is dismissed
- 2.Costs of the application to the Respondents
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution (Environment and Land Court) read with Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act (power to transfer suits instituted in subordinate courts)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "African Devine Church v Koech & 2 others (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E042 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 7586 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Miscellaneous suit on Notice of Motion dated 29th August 2025 (arising from Chief Magistrate ELC No. 125 of 2021, Eldoret). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/7586/eng@2025-11-06
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.