Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedMiscellaneous suit on Notice of Motion dated 29th August 2025 (arising from Chief Magistrate ELC No. 125 of 2021, Eldoret)· [2025] KEELC 7586 (KLR)

African Devine Church v Koech & 2 others (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E042 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 7586 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
6 November 2025
3,807 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~15 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's ELC in Eldoret ruled that magistrates' courts cannot hear adverse possession cases, and a case filed in the wrong court cannot simply be transferred.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Applicant, African Devine Church, filed a Notice of Motion dated 29th August 2025 seeking transfer of Chief Magistrate ELC No. 125 of 2021 (African Devine Church v Robert Kimaiyo Koech & 2 Others) from the Magistrate's Court at Eldoret to the Environment and Land Court. The underlying suit claimed 1/8 acre of Eldoret Municipality Block 21(King'ong'o)/444 by adverse possession and constructive trust. The Applicant argued that when the suit was filed in 2021, magistrates' courts were thought to have jurisdiction over adverse possession claims following Patrick Ndegwa Munyua, but the Court of Appeal's later decision in Sugawara vs Kiruti held that only the ELC has such jurisdiction. The 1st Respondent filed appearances but no response; the 2nd Respondent did not participate. The court framed two issues: whether magistrates' courts have jurisdiction over adverse possession claims, and whether the ELC could transfer the suit. On the first, applying Sugawara vs Kiruti and Section 38 of the Limitation of Actions Act, the court held that adverse possession claims are exclusively within the ELC's jurisdiction under Article 162(2)(b). On the second, following Equity Bank vs Bruce Mutie Mutuku and Albert Chaurembo Mumba (citing Kagenyi vs Musiramo), the court held that a suit filed in a court lacking jurisdiction cannot be transferred under Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act, since no competent suit exists to transfer. Noting that lack of jurisdiction was the only ground advanced, the court dismissed the motion with costs to the Respondents, advising the Applicant to withdraw the adverse possession claim and file it afresh in the ELC, or proceed with the constructive trust claim only in the magistrate's court.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction of Magistrates' Courts over adverse possession claims

Holding

Magistrates' Courts lack jurisdiction to hear and determine adverse possession claims, which are the exclusive preserve of the Environment and Land Court

Reasoning

Section 38 of the Limitation of Actions Act requires applications by a person claiming to be entitled to land by adverse possession to be made to the High Court. Following Sugawara vs Kiruti, 'High Court' must be construed as the Environment and Land Court under Article 162(2)(b). Section 9(a) of the Magistrates' Courts Act does not include adverse possession claims. Both courts are bound by the Court of Appeal decision under stare decisis.

p. 4
02

Whether the ELC can transfer a suit from a subordinate court that lacked jurisdiction

Holding

No - the power under Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act only permits transfer of a suit filed in a court with competent jurisdiction

Reasoning

Relying on Equity Bank Limited vs Bruce Mutie Mutuku and Albert Chaurembo Mumba (citing Kagenyi vs Musiramo), the court held that transfer cannot sanctify an incompetent suit. Since the only ground for the transfer was the lower court's lack of jurisdiction, and that ground was made out, no competent suit existed to transfer. The applicant's recourse is to withdraw the adverse possession claim and file afresh in the ELC.

p. 7
03

Whether the constructive trust claim can remain in the Magistrate's Court

Holding

The lower court may hear the constructive trust claim even though it cannot entertain the adverse possession claim

Reasoning

The court distinguished between the two heads of claim in the plaint. While the adverse possession component is outside the Magistrates' Court's jurisdiction, the constructive trust claim falls within matters magistrates duly gazetted under the Environment and Land Court Act can handle.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • Magistrates' Courts do not have jurisdiction to determine claims of adverse possession; such claims are reserved to the Environment and Land Court
  • The High Court (ELC) cannot under Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act transfer a suit filed in a court lacking jurisdiction to a court with jurisdiction

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Applicant's Notice of Motion dated 29th August, 2025 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the application to the Respondents

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Limitation of Actions ActSection 38
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 18(1)
  • Magistrates' Courts ActSection 9(a)
  • Environment and Land Court ActSection 26(3) and (4)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 162(2)(b)

Cases cited (9)

  • Patrick Ndegwa Munyua vs Benjamin Kiiru Mwangu & Another
    (2020) eKLR
  • Sugawara vs Kiruti (Sued in her Capacity as the Administratrix of the Estate of Mutarakwa Kiruti Lepaso alias Mutaraqwa Kiruti Lepaso alias Mutaragwa Kiroti Leposo and in her Own Capacity) & 3 Others
    (Civil Appeal E141 of 2022)(2024) KECA 1417 (KLR)
  • Owners of the Motor Vessel 'Lillian S' vs Caltex Oil (Kenya) Ltd
    (Civil Appeal 50 of 1989) [1989] KECA 48 (KLR)
  • Republic vs Karisa Chengo & 2 others
    (2017) eKLR
  • Reuben vs Mwangangi & 7 others
    (Environment & Land Case E011 of 2023) [2023] KEELC 21899 (KLR)
  • Michael Chebii Toroitich vs Peter Mogin Yatich Chebii
    (2013) eKLR
  • Equity Bank Limited vs Bruce Mutie Mutuku t/a Diani Tour Travel
    (2016) eKLR
  • Albert Chaurembo Mumba and 7 Others vs Maurice Munyao & 148 Others
    (2019) eKLR
  • Kagenyi vs Musiramo & Another
    (1968) EALR 43
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution (Environment and Land Court) read with Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act (power to transfer suits instituted in subordinate courts)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "African Devine Church v Koech & 2 others (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E042 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 7586 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Miscellaneous suit on Notice of Motion dated 29th August 2025 (arising from Chief Magistrate ELC No. 125 of 2021, Eldoret). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/7586/eng@2025-11-06

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.