Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCStruck OutPetition No E007 of 2025· [2025] KEELC 7582 (KLR)

Musembi & 9 others v Attorney General & 12 others (Petition E007 of 2025) (Environment and Land) [2025] KEELC 7582 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
5 November 2025
3,699 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~15 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court in Voi struck out a land petition because the same issues had already been decided, confirming you cannot re-litigate by adding new parties.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Petitioners, describing themselves as squatters originating from L.R No. 5865/2, filed a Petition dated 8th July 2025 seeking declarations on the enforceability of the Kenya Kwanza Coalition manifesto as a social contract under Article 10(2), a declaration of discrimination, an order of mandamus compelling the Government to compulsorily acquire Taita/Taveta Scheme Numbers 889 and 890 to facilitate access to affordable housing, and injunctive reliefs. The 13th Respondents raised a Preliminary Objection dated 4th August 2025 arguing the Petition was res judicata in view of Mombasa ELC Petition No. 6 of 2019 (Mathenge Ramathani Kamozu & 2 Others v Attorney General & 7 Others), decided by Munyao J, and that the Court was functus officio given the pending appeal in Mombasa Civil Application No. E058 of 2023. The 9th Respondent supported the objection on the ground that the Speaker of the National Assembly was wrongly joined. The Petitioners countered that their prayers were novel, that they had only a limited role in the earlier petition, and that res judicata applies sparingly in constitutional petitions. Framing three issues, the Court applied Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act and the Supreme Court's guidance in John Florence Maritime, found the issues, parties and prayers substantially similar to the earlier petition, and held that adding parties cannot evade res judicata. It further held the Court functus officio having rendered judgment with an appeal pending. The third issue was not addressed. The Preliminary Objection was upheld, the Petition struck out, with each party bearing their own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Petition is res judicata

Holding

Yes - the issues, prayers and parties are substantially similar to Mombasa ELC Petition No. 6 of 2019, in which the Petitioners participated

Reasoning

The Court compared the pleadings, prayers and parties in both suits as required by Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act and the Supreme Court's guidance in John Florence Maritime. It found the Petitioners were parties to the earlier petition concerning L.R No. 5865/2, from which Schemes 889 and 890 emanate, and that the new reliefs would require reconsideration of issues already determined. Adding parties does not cure res judicata.

p. 8
02

Whether the Court is functus officio

Holding

Yes - having rendered judgment in ELC No. 6 of 2019 and with the Court of Appeal seized of the appeal, the Court became functus officio

Reasoning

Applying the finality principle as explained by the Supreme Court in Raila Odinga (citing Pretorius), the Court noted that a court becomes functus officio upon pronouncing judgment. Since judgment was delivered in ELC No. 6 of 2019 and an appeal (Mombasa Civil Application No. E058 of 2023) is pending before the Court of Appeal, this Court has no further competence over the matter.

p. 9
03

Whether the Speaker of the National Assembly was wrongly joined

Holding

Not determined - unnecessary after the findings on res judicata and functus officio

Reasoning

Having resolved the first two issues against the Petitioners, the Court declined to address the remaining issue regarding the joinder of the Speaker of the National Assembly, as the Petition had already been struck out.

p. 9

Legal principles established

#
  • Res judicata applies to constitutional petitions and to matters of all categories, including issues of constitutional rights
  • Parties cannot evade res judicata by adding parties or causes of action in a subsequent suit

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Petition filed herein is hereby struck out.
  2. 2.Each party to bear own costs.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSection 7
  • Constitution of KenyaArticles 10(2), 27, 40(3)(b), 57

Cases cited (12)

  • Mathenge Ramathani Kamozu & 2 Others v The Hon. Attorney General & 7 Others
    Mombasa ELC Petition No. 6 of 2019
  • Simon Mwongi/Mwangi & Others v The Hon. Attorney General & Others
    Mombasa Civil Application No. E058 of 2023
  • David Mwandawiro Mabinka & 203 Others v The Director Of Land Adjudication & 5 Others
    Voi ELC Petition No. E011 of 2024
  • Okiya Omtatah Okoti v A. G & 6 Others
    (2014) eKLR
  • Kenya Commercial Bank Limited v Muiri Coffee Estate Limited & another
    (Motion No 42 of 2014) [2016] eKLR
  • John Florence Maritime Services Limited & another v Cabinet Secretary Transport & Infrastructure & 3 others
    (Petition 17 of 2015) [2021] KESC 39 (KLR)
  • Henderson v Henderson
    (1843) 67 ER 313
  • Satyadhyan Ghasal v Devajin Debi & Another
    1960 SCR (3) 590
  • Mweresa & 3 Others v Social Health Authority & Another
    (Petition E524 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 8365 (KLR)
  • Nancy Mwangi T/A Worthlin Marketers v Airtel Networks (K) Ltd & 2 Others
    (2014) eKLR
  • E.T v Attorney General & Another
    (2012) eKLR
  • Raila Odinga & 2 Others vs. Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission & 3 Others
    [2013] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2) of the Constitution (Environment and Land Court) - not expressly cited; jurisdiction assumed under the Environment and Land Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Musembi & 9 others v Attorney General & 12 others (Petition E007 of 2025)  (Environment and Land) [2025] KEELC 7582 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Petition No E007 of 2025. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/7582/eng@2025-11-05

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.