Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedELC Case (Kajiado) - Notice of Motion dated 17th March 2025· [2025] KEELC 7408 (KLR)

Boro v Mboro & another (Environment and Land Case E031 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 7408 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
30 October 2025
1,418 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kajiado court refused to stop a woman's sister from dealing with two Kisaju plots because the applicant's own documents showed she held them on her sister's behalf.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by the Environment and Land Court at Kajiado (L. Komingoi, J) determined a Notice of Motion dated 17th March 2025 by the Plaintiff, Virginia Gakuhi Boro, seeking a temporary injunction restraining the Defendants from dealing with Kajiado/Kisaju/2055 and Kajiado/Kisaju/2056, an order compelling the Chief Land Registrar to place a caution on the properties, an order for certified copies of land records, and in the alternative maintenance of status quo. The Plaintiff claimed she purchased and registered the suit properties on behalf of the 1st Defendant, funded litigation in ELC No. 944 of 2017 under an irrevocable Power of Attorney dated 27th April 2018, obtained titles on 28th December 2023, and that the titles were later cancelled and re-issued to the 1st Defendant. The 1st Defendant opposed, asserting she purchased the properties in 2002 and 2004, donated only a Special Power of Attorney for testimony in the earlier suit, and that the Plaintiff fraudulently caused transfer to herself. The court framed two issues: whether the application met the Giella v Cassman Brown threshold, and costs. Applying Giella as reaffirmed in Nguruman Limited v Jan Bonde Nielsen, the court held the applicant failed to establish a prima facie case with a probability of success, noting the DPP's letter showed she admitted holding the titles on behalf of her sister; she also failed to demonstrate irreparable harm, and the balance of convenience favoured the 1st Defendant as registered owner. The application was dismissed with costs to the 1st Defendant/Respondent.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the applicant established a prima facie case with a probability of success

Holding

She did not; the record showed she held the two titles on behalf of her sister, the 1st Defendant, per the DPP's letter and the special Power of Attorney

Reasoning

The court noted that in the DPP's letter the applicant admitted holding the two titles on behalf of her sister, and that a special Power of Attorney dated 27th April 2018 had been donated by the 1st Defendant. Against that material the applicant could not show a prima facie case with a probability of success at trial, defeating the first Giella limb.

p. 3
02

Whether the applicant would suffer irreparable harm and where the balance of convenience lies

Holding

No irreparable harm demonstrated; the balance of convenience tilts in favour of the 1st Defendant, the registered owner

Reasoning

Having failed the first limb of Giella, the court still assessed irreparable harm and the balance of convenience. It found the applicant failed to demonstrate irreparable harm and that the balance of convenience favoured the 1st Defendant, who is the registered owner of the suit properties, so the injunction could not issue.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • The principles for grant of a temporary injunction are those in Giella v Cassman Brown, as reaffirmed in Nguruman Limited v Jan Bonde Nielsen

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion dated 17th March 2025 is dismissed with costs to the 1st Defendant/Respondent
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 73 & 48 of the Land Registration Act; Sections 3 & 3A of the Civil Procedure Act; Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution of Kenya

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Boro v Mboro & another (Environment and Land Case E031 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 7408 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). ELC Case (Kajiado) - Notice of Motion dated 17th March 2025. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/7408/eng@2025-10-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.