Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNotice of motion dated 23-4-2025 (judgment delivered 29-9-2022 in the principal suit)· [2025] KEELC 6624 (KLR)

Mugumoini Farmers Co Ltd v Inshwil Builders Engineering Ltd; Ruitha & another (Interested Parties) (Environment and Land Case 67 of 2018) [2025] KEELC 6624 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
30 September 2025
1,513 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled that once you appeal a judgment, you lose the right to ask for a review, even if you later withdraw the appeal.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Murang'a (M.N. Gicheru J) disposed of a notice of motion dated 23-4-2025 by the plaintiff, Mugumoini Farmers Co-operative Society Limited, seeking review, variation or setting aside of the court's judgment of 29-9-2022 which had dismissed its suit challenging the defendants' title to Kakuzi/Kirimiri Block 7/37 and its subdivisions. The plaintiff relied on allegedly newly discovered evidence - a 2003 notification of change of directors obtained from the Registrar of Companies in February 2025, and proceedings in Thika ELC 245 of 2017 (formerly Nairobi HCCC 3086/1994) showing a prohibitory order over the suit land subsisting at the date of the sale agreement and unpaid decretal sums. The defendant and interested party opposed through a preliminary objection asserting want of jurisdiction (functus officio), the bar in Order 45 rule 1 arising from the plaintiff's filed and later withdrawn appeal, bad faith, and inordinate delay of about 31 months. The court treated the five points of law as issues for determination. It held that the new evidence was reasonably obtainable when the suit was filed in 2018, would not assist since the court had already made findings on the authority for the sale, and that by preferring an appeal the plaintiff lost the right to review - withdrawal of the appeal did not revive it. The motion was dismissed with costs to the defendants and the interested party.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether withdrawal of an appeal revives the right to seek review

Holding

No; once an appeal is filed, the right to review is lost, and withdrawal of the appeal does not restore it

Reasoning

Order 45 rule 1(a) and (b) of the Civil Procedure Rules confers review only where no appeal has been preferred. The plaintiff filed Nyeri Appeal No. 155/2022 against the judgment and later withdrew it. The court found no precedent ousting the clear statutory bar and held review unavailable.

p. 3
02

Whether the newly discovered evidence met the threshold for review

Holding

It did not; the documents were obtainable at filing and the court had already made findings on the very issue

Reasoning

The suit was filed in 2018 yet the plaintiff sought to introduce 2003 company records and 1994/2017 proceedings obtained in 2025 without clear and convincing reasons. Order 3 rule 2 requires documents relied on to accompany the suit, and the evidence addressed a matter on which the court had already made findings.

p. 3
03

Whether an error apparent on the face of the record existed

Holding

The ground was not raised in the motion or supporting affidavit and could not be entertained

Reasoning

Although raised for the first time in written submissions, the ground of error apparent on the face of the record was absent from the motion's grounds and supporting affidavit, and the court declined to consider it.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Once a party prefers an appeal against a judgment or order, that party loses the right to seek review of the same judgment or order
  • A party filing a suit must have all supporting evidence ready at the time of filing, and withdrawal of an appeal does not revive a right of review

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The notice of motion dated 23-4-2025 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the motion awarded to the Defendants and the interested parties
On appeal from
Court of Appeal
Nyeri Civil Appeal No. 155/2022 (also referred to as No.158 of 2022)
Jurisdiction invoked
Articles 2, 10, 47, 159(2)(d) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010; Sections 11 of the Fair Administrative Action Act; Sections 1A, 1B and 80 of the Civil Procedure Act; Order 45(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mugumoini Farmers Co Ltd v Inshwil Builders Engineering Ltd; Ruitha & another (Interested Parties) (Environment and Land Case 67 of 2018) [2025] KEELC 6624 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Notice of motion dated 23-4-2025 (judgment delivered 29-9-2022 in the principal suit). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/6624/eng@2025-09-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.