Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in the judgment (Notice of Application dated 15th May, 2025)· [2025] KEELC 6307 (KLR)

Njuguna v Ngetich (Environment and Land Case 43 of 2020) [2025] KEELC 6307 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
25 September 2025
1,169 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court in Nakuru dismissed a bid to overturn a two-year-old ex-parte judgment because the applicant gave no evidence supporting his excuse for missing court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Applicant, Matthew Ngetich, moved the Nakuru Environment and Land Court by a Notice of Application dated 15th May, 2025 seeking to set aside ex-parte proceedings and a judgment delivered on 27th April, 2023, so as to be allowed to defend the suit, with costs provided for. He contended that he was the legal owner of the suit property, that the matter had gone to mediation, that he was unwell and mentally unstable at the time judgment was delivered, that he had since recovered, and that he had a good defence and counter-claim raising triable issues. The Respondent opposed, averring the application was an afterthought aimed at derailing enforcement, that mediation collapsed because the Applicant failed to attend, that the hospital records showed illness only in March 2023 while judgment was delivered in April 2023, that service was effected through his advocate, that his defence and counter-claim had already been considered, and that the judgment was final. Neither party filed submissions. The court framed a single issue: whether the Applicant deserved the review orders sought. Relying on Order 45 Rule 1(1) and Order 12 Rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Rules, and applying Shah v Mbogo as cited in Kenya National Private Security Workers Union v Security Guards Services Limited, the court held that the Applicant bore the burden of proving non-attendance was not deliberate, that he adduced no evidence of illness, and that none of the three grounds for review was met. The application was dismissed with costs to the Respondent.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Applicant satisfied the grounds for review under Order 45 Rule 1(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules and/or setting aside under Order 12 Rule 7

Holding

The Applicant failed to establish discovery of new and important matter, error apparent on the face of the record, or any other sufficient reason, and produced no evidence of illness at the time of judgment.

Reasoning

The court reiterated that review lies on discovery of new and important matter or evidence not within the Applicant's knowledge despite due diligence, an error apparent on the face of the record, or any other sufficient reason. Although judgment was delivered in the Applicant's absence, he adduced no evidence of illness; the Respondent's averment that the hospital records showed he was unwell in March 2023, well before the April 2023 judgment, was unrebutted. The discretion to set aside exists to avoid injustice, not to assist a party who obstructs or delays the course of justice.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A party seeking to set aside an ex-parte judgment must show that non-attendance was not deliberate but occasioned by a reasonable excuse or omission; the court's discretion is exercised to avoid injustice, not to reward delay or obstruction.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Application dated 15th May, 2025 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the application to the Respondent
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 45 Rule 1(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Njuguna v Ngetich (Environment and Land Case 43 of 2020) [2025] KEELC 6307 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in the judgment (Notice of Application dated 15th May, 2025). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/6307/eng@2025-09-25

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.