Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNotice of Motion dated 11th December 2024 (Judicial Review proceedings)· [2025] KEELC 6271 (KLR)

Republic v Ministry of Industry, Trade & Co-operative & 2 others (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case 2 of 2019) [2025] KEELC 6271 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
25 September 2025
1,535 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Bungoma court ruled that interest was never awarded on a Kshs.9.2 million land compensation sum, limiting it to the taxed costs only.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by Boaz N. Olao J of the Environment and Land Court at Bungoma determined an unopposed Notice of Motion dated 11th December 2024 in which the Applicant, Margaret Nelima Odhiambo, sought a declaration that she was entitled to interest on the decretal sum of Kshs.9,200,000 from the date of judgment until settlement in full. The principal sum arose from a judgment of the late Mukunya J delivered on 28th March 2018 in Bungoma ELC Case No 103 of 2016, which ordered the 1st and 3rd Defendants (now Respondents) to pay the Applicant Kshs.9,200,000 as compensation for compulsory acquisition of her land, Malakisi/Township/396, plus costs. Costs were taxed at Kshs.281,320. When the decree went unsatisfied, the Applicant obtained mandamus orders from A. Omollo J on 24th February 2021. Settlement stalled because the Attorney General's office took the view that no interest had been awarded. The Court interpreted the judgments and held that Mukunya J's judgment made no order for interest on the principal sum; the decree's inclusion of 'and interest' was made in error, and interest could attach only to the taxed costs. The Motion partially succeeded: interest is payable only on the taxed costs of Kshs.281,320, no interest is payable on Kshs.9,200,000, and there were no orders as to costs of the Motion.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether interest was payable on the principal decretal sum of Kshs.9,200,000

Holding

No interest is payable on the principal sum because the judgment of Mukunya J made no order for interest; only the taxed costs attract interest

Reasoning

The Court traced the litigation history: Mukunya J's judgment of 28 March 2018 awarded Kshs.9,200,000 plus costs but was silent on interest. The Decree that followed improperly added 'and interest'. Although Omollo J's 2021 mandamus judgment granted the Motion as prayed (which had sought 14% interest), the mandamus was founded on a judgment containing no interest order. The Court held the decree's reference to interest was in error and interest could attach only to costs.

p. 4
02

Whether the Court could interpret, rather than review, the judgment of Omollo J

Holding

The Court was not sitting on appeal over Omollo J's judgment but could interpret it as the Applicant herself had requested

Reasoning

The Applicant's affidavit expressly sought an interpretation of the judgment of 24 February 2021. The Court noted that it could not sit on appeal over a coordinate court's judgment, but acceded to the Applicant's own request to interpret the judgment, concluding that the interest component could only relate to the taxed costs since the foundation judgment awarded no interest on the principal sum.

p. 3
03

Whether an unopposed Motion must automatically be granted

Holding

Even where a Motion is unopposed, the Court must still satisfy itself that the orders sought are justified

Reasoning

Although neither Respondent filed responses or submissions, the Court held that it remains enjoined to consider the application on its merits and determine whether the orders are justified, rather than granting relief merely because it is unopposed. This led the Court to partially decline the relief despite the absence of opposition.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Interest on a decretal sum cannot be awarded where the underlying judgment made no provision for interest; a decree embedding interest not granted in the judgment is issued in error

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Motion partly succeeds with the order that the interest payable is only on the taxed costs of Kshs.281,320
  2. 2.No interest is payable on the sum of Kshs.9,200,000
  3. 3.No orders as to costs of this Motion
Jurisdiction invoked
Original judicial review jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court; the Court also interpreted the judgment of A. Omollo J at the Applicant's own request

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Republic v Ministry of Industry, Trade & Co-operative & 2 others (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case 2 of 2019) [2025] KEELC 6271 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Notice of Motion dated 11th December 2024 (Judicial Review proceedings). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/6271/eng@2025-09-25

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.