Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNotice of Motion dated 8th November 2024· [2025] KEELC 6210 (KLR)

Republic v National Land Commission & 2 others; Kamasas Farmers Co-operative Society (Interested Party); Eastern Produce Kenya Limited (Ex parte Applicant) (Environment and Land Civil Miscellaneous Application E001 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 6210 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
23 September 2025
1,364 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court allowed late-filed court submissions, confirming that procedural deadlines should not block a party's right to a fair hearing.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Kapsabet (G M A Ongondo, J) determined a Notice of Motion dated 8th November 2024 by the 1st respondent/applicant seeking to have its submissions filed on 26th September 2024 deemed properly filed. The applicant explained that after a ruling of 13th June 2024 the parties were directed to file submissions; on 26th September 2024 the court noted no submissions were on record and gave three days to file. Counsel was engaged in a three-Judge matter at Iten (Kituo cha Sheria-vs-Honourable Attorney General) and faced e-filing challenges, leading to late filing and a direction of 15th October 2024 that the submissions would not be considered. The Ex parte applicant opposed through grounds of opposition, arguing no cogent reason for the delay and prejudice from new issues; the 2nd and 3rd respondents supported the application and the interested party did not oppose. The court held that under Article 159(2)(d) and the overriding objective, justice should not be sacrificed on procedural technicality, and that sections 3 and 19 of the Environment and Land Court Act and Articles 48, 50(1) and 25(c) guarantee access to justice and fair hearing. Finding the explanation satisfactory, the court allowed the application in terms of prayer one, deeming the submissions properly filed, with costs in the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether out-of-time submissions should be admitted

Holding

The applicant gave a satisfactory explanation for the delay and has an unlimited right to fair hearing; the submissions filed 26th September 2024 are deemed properly filed

Reasoning

The court noted that following the introduction of the overriding objective and Article 159(2)(d), justice must not be sacrificed on the altar of procedural technicality. It invoked sections 3 and 19 of the Environment and Land Court Act and Articles 48, 50(1) and 25(c) on access to justice and fair hearing. The delay was attributed to counsel's involvement in a three-Judge matter at Iten and e-filing challenges, and the court found this explanation satisfactory, exercising its discretion in favour of admission.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Courts should sustain rather than strike out pleadings or matters on purely technical grounds, per the overriding objective and Article 159(2)(d)
  • The right to be heard before an adverse decision is a fundamental right permeating the justice system

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The submissions filed on 26th September 2024 by the respondent/applicant are deemed as properly filed
  2. 2.Costs in the cause
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 3 and 19 of the Environment and Land Court Act 2015; Articles 159(2)(d) and (e), 48, 50(1) and 25(c) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Republic v National Land Commission & 2 others; Kamasas Farmers Co-operative Society (Interested Party); Eastern Produce Kenya Limited (Ex parte Applicant) (Environment and Land Civil Miscellaneous Application E001 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 6210 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Notice of Motion dated 8th November 2024. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/6210/eng@2025-09-23

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.