Republic v County Government of Kisumu; Auma (Ex parte Applicant) (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case E001 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 6070 (KLR)
The bottom line
#Kenya's High Court struck out a contempt case against Kisumu's Governor because county debts must be enforced against the Chief Officer for Finance, not the Governor.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the Governor of a county is the accounting officer of the county government liable to be cited for contempt for non-payment of a decretal sum
No. The accounting officer of a county government is the Chief Officer for finance, designated by the County Executive Committee Member for finance under Section 148 of the Public Finance Management Act; the Governor is not the accounting officer.
Section 2 of the Public Finance Management Act ties the accounting officer of a county to Section 148, which empowers the CECM for finance to designate accounting officers for county government entities. Section 148(2) makes the person administering a county entity the accounting officer; under Section 45(3) of the County Governments Act those administrators are Chief Officers, not CECMs or the Governor. The three-judge bench in Council of Governors v Senate likewise held a Governor is not an accounting officer.
Against which accounting officer should a judgment creditor of a county government enforce payment
Against the accounting officer of the concerned department; here the Chief Officer of finance at the County Government of Kisumu, not the Governor.
Section 21(3) of the Government Proceedings Act obliges the accounting officer for the government department concerned to pay certified sums. Both levels of government operate through departments, and the department concerned with payment of debts in this case is the finance department, whose accounting officer is the Chief Officer of finance. The application, having been brought against the Governor, failed for non-joinder and was struck out.
Whether the applicant established contempt of court against the respondent
The court did not reach a finding on contempt because the application was struck out for non-joinder of the proper party.
Although the facts were undisputed - the mandamus order of 8th July 2024 and the non-payment - the court held the wrong person had been cited. Since the Governor is not the accounting officer responsible for payment, contempt proceedings against the county as constituted could not succeed, and the application was struck out rather than dismissed on the merits.
Legal principles established
#- The accounting officer of a county government is the Chief Officer for finance designated for that purpose by the County Executive Committee Member for finance, not the Governor or the CECM for finance
- Under Section 148(2) of the Public Finance Management Act, the person responsible for administering a county government entity (the Chief Officer) is its accounting officer
- The accounting officers of county government departments are obliged to settle decretal amounts awarded against the county government under Section 21(3) of the Government Proceedings Act
- A Governor is not an Accounting Officer of a county government
Court orders
#- 1.The Notice of Motion dated 16th December 2024 is struck out for non-joinder of the proper party (the Chief Officer for finance, County Government of Kisumu)
- 2.Each party shall bear its own costs
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Judicial review jurisdiction of the High Court (order of mandamus and contempt of court proceedings), invoked under Sections 3 and 5 of the Judicature Act, Sections 1A, 1B, 3A and 63 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Republic v County Government of Kisumu; Auma (Ex parte Applicant) (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case E001 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 6070 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Judicial Review Application (ex parte Dominic Odondi Auma). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/6070/eng@2025-09-18
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.