Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCStruck OutJudicial Review Application (ex parte Dominic Odondi Auma)· [2025] KEELC 6070 (KLR)

Republic v County Government of Kisumu; Auma (Ex parte Applicant) (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case E001 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 6070 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya
18 September 2025
4,922 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~20 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's High Court struck out a contempt case against Kisumu's Governor because county debts must be enforced against the Chief Officer for Finance, not the Governor.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The ex parte applicant, Dominic Odondi Auma, obtained judgment against Victor Sande and the County Government of Kisumu in Kisumu CMC ELC No. E034 of 2021, including Kshs. 188,384/- in special damages plus taxed costs, certified at Kshs. 490,629/-. When the county failed to pay, this court on 8th July 2024 issued mandamus compelling payment, and costs of that application were taxed at Kshs. 87,555/-. Payment still not coming forth, the applicant brought a Notice of Motion dated 16th December 2024 seeking a declaration of contempt against the County Government of Kisumu and the committal or fining of Professor Peter Anyang' Nyong'o, the Governor. The respondent neither filed a response nor submissions; the matter proceeded on written submissions on issues of law only. The court examined the Government Proceedings Act (Section 21, extended to county governments by the 2015 amendment), the County Governments Act, the Public Finance Management Act and Article 226 of the Constitution. Surveying recent decisions, the court held that the accounting officer of a county government is the Chief Officer for finance, designated by the County Executive Committee Member for finance under Section 148 of the Public Finance Management Act, not the Governor or the CECM. The court expressly departed from its own earlier position in Republic v. Governor of Nairobi City County Government (Nairobi ELC JR No. 14 of 2019). Since the accounting officer obliged to settle the decree is the Chief Officer of finance, the application, brought against the Governor, failed for non-joinder and was struck out, with each party bearing its own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Governor of a county is the accounting officer of the county government liable to be cited for contempt for non-payment of a decretal sum

Holding

No. The accounting officer of a county government is the Chief Officer for finance, designated by the County Executive Committee Member for finance under Section 148 of the Public Finance Management Act; the Governor is not the accounting officer.

Reasoning

Section 2 of the Public Finance Management Act ties the accounting officer of a county to Section 148, which empowers the CECM for finance to designate accounting officers for county government entities. Section 148(2) makes the person administering a county entity the accounting officer; under Section 45(3) of the County Governments Act those administrators are Chief Officers, not CECMs or the Governor. The three-judge bench in Council of Governors v Senate likewise held a Governor is not an accounting officer.

p. 9
02

Against which accounting officer should a judgment creditor of a county government enforce payment

Holding

Against the accounting officer of the concerned department; here the Chief Officer of finance at the County Government of Kisumu, not the Governor.

Reasoning

Section 21(3) of the Government Proceedings Act obliges the accounting officer for the government department concerned to pay certified sums. Both levels of government operate through departments, and the department concerned with payment of debts in this case is the finance department, whose accounting officer is the Chief Officer of finance. The application, having been brought against the Governor, failed for non-joinder and was struck out.

p. 10
03

Whether the applicant established contempt of court against the respondent

Holding

The court did not reach a finding on contempt because the application was struck out for non-joinder of the proper party.

Reasoning

Although the facts were undisputed - the mandamus order of 8th July 2024 and the non-payment - the court held the wrong person had been cited. Since the Governor is not the accounting officer responsible for payment, contempt proceedings against the county as constituted could not succeed, and the application was struck out rather than dismissed on the merits.

p. 10

Legal principles established

#
  • The accounting officer of a county government is the Chief Officer for finance designated for that purpose by the County Executive Committee Member for finance, not the Governor or the CECM for finance
  • Under Section 148(2) of the Public Finance Management Act, the person responsible for administering a county government entity (the Chief Officer) is its accounting officer
  • The accounting officers of county government departments are obliged to settle decretal amounts awarded against the county government under Section 21(3) of the Government Proceedings Act
  • A Governor is not an Accounting Officer of a county government

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion dated 16th December 2024 is struck out for non-joinder of the proper party (the Chief Officer for finance, County Government of Kisumu)
  2. 2.Each party shall bear its own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Judicature ActSections 3 and 5
  • Civil Procedure ActSections 1A, 1B, 3A and 63
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 51 Rule 1
  • Constitution of KenyaArticles 155, 179(1), (2), (4), (6), 226(2), 228(6)
  • County Governments ActSections 6, 30(2), 30(3), 31(c), 39(1), 45(1), 45(3), 46
  • Public Finance Management ActSections 2, 5(1), 67(1), (3), 148(1)-(4), 149
  • Government Proceedings ActSection 21(1)-(5)

Cases cited (6)

  • Cecil Miller v. Jackson Njeru & Another
    [2017] e KLR
  • Agnes Mutethya Mulwa v. The County Attorney, The County Executive Committee Member for Finance, County Government of Kiambu, the Chief Officer Finance, County Government of Kiambu, and the Governor, County Government of Kiambu
    Nairobi Judicial Review Application No. E097 of 2025
  • Republic v. The County Government of Mombasa, The Chief Officer Finance, and the County Attorney
    Mombasa Judicial Review Application No. E006 of 2024
  • Council of Governors & Others v. The Senate
    [2015] eKLR
  • Republic v. The Governor of Nairobi City County Government and the County Executive Committee Member For Finance, Nairobi City County Government
    Nairobi ELC Judicial Review No. 14 of 2019
  • Dominic Odondi Auma v. Victor Sande & County Government of Kisumu
    Kisumu CMC ELC No. E034 of 2021
Jurisdiction invoked
Judicial review jurisdiction of the High Court (order of mandamus and contempt of court proceedings), invoked under Sections 3 and 5 of the Judicature Act, Sections 1A, 1B, 3A and 63 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Republic v County Government of Kisumu; Auma (Ex parte Applicant) (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case E001 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 6070 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Judicial Review Application (ex parte Dominic Odondi Auma). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/6070/eng@2025-09-18

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.