Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedNot stated in the extract· [2025] KEELC 5978 (KLR)

PJ Kakad Advocates LLP v National Bank of Kenya Limited & another (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case 16 of 2017) [2025] KEELC 5978 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
4 September 2025
1,699 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court allowed a lawyer to attach National Land Commission bank accounts to recover Kshs. 2 million in unpaid fees.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a garnishee application by way of notice of motion dated 19th December 2024, brought under Order 23 Rules 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Sections 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act by the applicant, Pravinchandra Jamnadas Kakad, advocate for Arvind Kanji Patel. The applicant sought attachment of funds held at the National Bank of Kenya, Hill Plaza Branch, to answer a decree upon a certificate of taxation dated 25th April 2023 for Kshs. 2,043,555. The respondent, the National Land Commission, admitted the debt but filed a preliminary objection and replying affidavit contending that it was a government entity protected by Section 21(4) of the Government Proceedings Act and Order 29 Rule 2(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules; that the monies in the accounts were special compensation accounts under Section 115(2) of the Land Act held in trust for acquiring bodies in compulsory acquisition; and that the applicant had not exhausted remedies such as mandamus. The court framed a single issue: whether the orders sought should issue. Finding the debt undisputed and no response filed by the garnishee, the court held the garnishee was custodian of accounts owned by the respondent and rejected the trust argument as an attempt to evade responsibility. Applying Nyandoro & Company Advocates v National Water Conservation & Pipeline Corporation, the court allowed the application, ordered attachment of the funds, directed the garnishee to attend court on 5th November 2025 to show cause why it should not pay, and awarded the applicant costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the notice of motion dated 19th December 2024 should be allowed

Holding

The application was allowed; funds in the garnishee's accounts were ordered attached to answer the decree on the certificate of taxation

Reasoning

The existence of the certificate of taxation dated 25th April 2023 for Kshs. 2,043,555 was not in dispute and the respondent admitted the debt. The respondent's claim that the monies were held in trust for acquiring bodies was rejected as an attempt to evade responsibility. In the absence of any response by the garnishee, the court was satisfied the garnishee was custodian of the accounts. The court relied on Nyandoro & Company Advocates v National Water Conservation & Pipeline Corporation, holding that a litigant is entitled to reap the fruits of judgment.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A judgment-creditor may enforce an unsatisfied decree by garnishee proceedings against funds held by the garnishee for the judgment-debtor, even where the debtor is a commission.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.All funds held by National Bank of Kenya, Hill Plaza Branch, in the stated accounts due and owing to the judgment creditor be attached to answer the decree on the certificate of taxation dated 25th April 2023 for Kshs. 2,043,555/-
  2. 2.The garnishee to attend court on 05/11/2025 to show cause why it should not pay or deposit monies due and owing to the judgment creditor in satisfaction of the decree and costs of the garnishee proceedings
  3. 3.The applicant is entitled to costs of the application

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 23 Rules 1 and 2; Order 23 Rule 4; Order 29 Rule 2(2)
  • Civil Procedure ActSections 1A, 1B, 3A
  • Government Proceedings ActSection 21(4)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 249(3)
  • Land ActSection 115(2)

Cases cited (7)

  • Ikon Prints Media Company Limited v Kenya National Highways Authority & 2 Others
    [2015] eKLR
  • Retirement Benefits Scheme v Attorney General & 3 Others
    [2017] eKLR
  • Okiya Omtata Okoiti & Another v Attorney General & 7 Others
    [2013] eKLR
  • R v National Land Commission ex parte Sceneries Ltd
    ELC JR E010 of 2021
  • Kenya National Examination Council v Republic Ex Parte Geoffrey Gathenji Njoroge & 9 Others
    [1997] eKLR
  • Prof Tom Ojienda & Associates and National Land Commission
    Miscellaneous Application No. 29B of 2016
  • Nyandoro & Company Advocates v National Water Conservation & Pipeline Corporation; Kenya Commercial Bank Group Limited (Garnishee)
    [2021] KEHC 13342 (KLR)
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 23 Rules 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Sections 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "PJ Kakad Advocates LLP v National Bank of Kenya Limited & another (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case 16 of 2017) [2025] KEELC 5978 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in the extract. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/5978/eng@2025-09-04

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.