Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in judgment· [2025] KEELC 5879 (KLR)

Registered Trustees of Child Welfare Society of Kenya v Diocese of Embu Trustees, Registered & another (Environment and Land Case 10 of 2022) [2025] KEELC 5879 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
25 June 2025
1,221 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court confirmed that incorporated trustees can sue in their corporate name, dismissing an attempt to strike out the land suit.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The 1st defendant, The Diocese of Embu Trustees, raised a preliminary objection in a land suit brought by the Registered Trustees of Child Welfare Society of Kenya, contending that the plaintiff lacked locus standi. It argued that the plaintiff was an amorphous body whose registration documents, including a 1955 ministerial approval, a 1969 gazette notice as an adoption society, and registration as a charitable children's institution, conferred no legal status or capacity to sue or be sued. It further argued that under section 3 of the Trustees (Perpetual Succession) Act the suit ought to have been instituted by the trustees named in the certificate of incorporation, rendering the verifying affidavit of Penina Wairima and the witness statement of Irene Mureithi nullities and the suit a nullity. The plaintiff countered that the objection raised contested factual issues contrary to the Mukisa Biscuit threshold, and that its certificate of incorporation confirmed its status as an exempted society and body corporate capable of suing in its corporate name, relying on section 3(2) and (3) of the Trustees (Perpetual Succession) Act and the Maximum Miracle Centre decision. The court, per K. Bor J, held that section 3(3) confers on incorporated trustees corporate status, perpetual succession and the power to sue and be sued in their corporate name, applied the Maximum Miracle Centre authority, found the objection lacking in merit, and dismissed it with costs to the plaintiffs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the plaintiff, described as the Registered Trustees of Child Welfare Society of Kenya, has locus standi to institute the suit in its corporate name

Holding

The objection lacks merit; under section 3(3) of the Trustees (Perpetual Succession) Act the incorporated trustees may sue and be sued in their corporate name

Reasoning

Section 3(3) of the Trustees (Perpetual Succession) Act, Cap 164 confers on incorporated trustees corporate status with perpetual succession and the power to sue and be sued in their corporate name. The court found guidance in Registered Trustees of Maximum Miracle Centre v Andrew Mlewa Mkare, which restated the same position, and concluded the plaintiff had capacity to institute the proceedings.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Once trustees are incorporated under the Trustees (Perpetual Succession) Act, they become a body corporate by the name described in the certificate and may sue and be sued in that corporate name

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The preliminary objection is dismissed with costs to the plaintiffs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Trustees (Perpetual Succession) ActSection 3(2) and (3); Cap 164
  • Prevention of Cruelty to and Neglect of Children Ordinance (No. 12 of 1955)Section 9
  • Adoption Act
  • Children's Institution, Regulations 2005Regulation 3(1)

Cases cited (2)

  • Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd v. West End Distributors
    [1969] EA 696
  • Registered Trustees of Maximum Miracle Centre v Andrew Mlewa Mkare
    [2013] KEHC 2553 (KLR)
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Registered Trustees of Child Welfare Society of Kenya v Diocese of Embu Trustees, Registered & another (Environment and Land Case 10 of 2022) [2025] KEELC 5879 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/5879/eng@2025-06-25

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.