Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedKisii ELCA No. 25 of 2019 (appeal from ruling of 5 December 2023 in Kisii CMCC No. 96 of 2018)· [2025] KEELC 5725 (KLR)

Ntabo & another v Chweya (Environment and Land Appeal E023 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 5725 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court of Kenya
29 July 2025
1,922 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court confirmed you cannot ask a court to review its own judgment while simultaneously appealing that same judgment to a higher court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The respondent sued the two appellants, sons of Maria Ngangi Gwako, in separate suits (Kisii ELC No. 100 of 2015 and No. 340 of 2015) later consolidated as Kisii CMCC No. 96 of 2018, claiming that they interfered with land he purchased from their mother, resulting in title Wanjare/Bokeire/5541. The trial court delivered judgment on 10 September 2019 in the respondent's favour, ordering the appellants to give vacant possession in 45 days, finding no proof of fraud and no counterclaim. The appellants appealed (Kisii ELCA No. 25 of 2019). While that appeal was pending, they sought review on the ground that the respondent's witness, Evans Mose Maosa, who testified as a surveyor, was not a surveyor; that application was dismissed on 27 October 2020 because his qualifications could have been tested at the hearing. A second review application, based on Maosa's conviction on 31 August 2023 for falsely pretending to be a surveyor, was dismissed on 5 December 2023 as res judicata and barred by the pending appeal. On appeal, Munyao Sila J held that the appeal lay only against the ruling, not the judgment; that Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Act makes review unavailable to a party who has filed an appeal; and that the second review application was res judicata as it raised the same ground as the first. The appeal was dismissed with costs to be paid by the 2nd appellant, the 1st appellant having withdrawn.

Key legal issues

#
01

Availability of review where an appeal is pending

Holding

Review under Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Act is only available to a party who has not preferred an appeal; filing review while an appeal is pending is an abuse of process.

Reasoning

Section 80 confines review to decrees or orders from which no appeal has been preferred where an appeal is allowed. The appellants had filed Kisii ELCA No. 25 of 2019 against the judgment before moving for review, and the appeal's pendency was never disputed. Both proceedings could not be maintained simultaneously, so the trial Magistrate rightly dismissed the review application.

p. 3
02

Res judicata as between successive review applications

Holding

The second review application, based on the surveyor's conviction, raised the same issue as the first dismissed application and was therefore res judicata.

Reasoning

The first review application had already raised the surveyor's professional qualification and was dismissed on the basis that the issue could have been tested at cross-examination. The subsequent conviction did not change that reasoning; only an appeal against the first ruling could. Re-litigating the same ground by a second review application was barred.

p. 4
03

Scope of the appeal before the court

Holding

The appeal was against the review ruling only, not the trial judgment, so the court could not reassess trial evidence.

Reasoning

The judge clarified at the outset that the appeal challenged the ruling dismissing the second review application, not the judgment of 10 September 2019. Submissions about trial evidence, including the evidence of Britinus Ongangi and the surveyor's role in the mutation, were therefore outside the scope of the appeal.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A party who has filed an appeal cannot simultaneously maintain an application for review of the same decree or order.
  • A second application for review raising the same ground as a dismissed first application is res judicata.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal by the 2nd appellant is dismissed
  2. 2.The 2nd appellant to pay the costs of the appeal, the 1st appellant having withdrawn from it

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Survey Act, Cap 299Section 37(b)
  • Civil Procedure Act, Cap 21, Laws of KenyaSection 80
On appeal from
Chief Magistrates' Court at Kisii
Kisii CMCC No. 96 of 2018 (ruling of 5 December 2023)
Jurisdiction invoked
First appellate jurisdiction under the Civil Procedure Act over appeals from the Magistrates' Court (appeal against ruling dismissing application for review under Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Act, Cap 21)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ntabo & another v Chweya (Environment and Land Appeal E023 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 5725 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Kisii ELCA No. 25 of 2019 (appeal from ruling of 5 December 2023 in Kisii CMCC No. 96 of 2018). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/5725/eng@2025-07-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.