Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNot stated in the excerpt· [2025] KEELC 5710 (KLR)

Nthenge v Mulwa & 3 others (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E057 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 5710 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya
31 July 2025
1,554 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The High Court in Machakos let a sick litigant file his appeal late and halted execution of the judgment against him, provided he files the appeal within 30 days.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was an application dated 12th June 2025 under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, Sections 1A, 1B, 3A and 79G of the Civil Procedure Act and Article 159 of the Constitution, by Muthama Nthenge, the Applicant. He sought certification as urgent, leave to file a Memorandum of Appeal out of time against a Ruling dated 12th November 2024 in ELC Case No. 751 of 2017, and stay of execution of the Judgment of 7th June 2023 and Decree of 4th July 2023 issued by the Chief Magistrate's Court at Machakos. The Applicant explained that judgment had been entered against him ex parte after his advocate ceased acting, that a ruling declining to set aside that judgment was delivered on 12th November 2024, and that his failure to file the appeal in time was caused by serious ill health including hypertension, diabetes, memory loss, heart and kidney conditions, evidenced by medical documents. The court framed the main issue as whether to allow the appeal to be filed out of time. It applied Section 79G and the Supreme Court's Salat principles on extension of time, and the Order 42 Rule 6(2) conditions for stay. Finding the Applicant medically incapacitated and not guilty of inordinate delay, the court granted prayers 2 and 4, conditional on the appeal being filed and served within 30 days, with costs in the cause. Delivered at Machakos on 31st July 2025 by N.A. Matheka, J.

Key legal issues

#
01

Extension of time to file appeal under Section 79G

Holding

The delay was not inordinate because the Applicant's ill health, evidenced medically, incapacitated him; the court found the application merited

Reasoning

The court set out the Section 79G test and the Salat principles requiring an applicant to lay a basis for extension. It examined the pleadings, found the Applicant's advocate ceased acting and the Applicant, on documentary medical evidence, was incapacitated and unable to follow proceedings. Comparing the ruling date (12th November 2024) with the application date (12th June 2025), the court found no inordinate delay in the circumstances and granted leave.

p. 4
02

Stay of execution pending appeal under Order 42 Rule 6(2)

Holding

Stay was granted as prayer 4, conditioned on the appeal being filed and served within 30 days

Reasoning

The court restated the three conditions: unreasonable delay, substantial loss, and security. It found the delay not inordinate, accepted the threat that execution would deprive the old and ailing Applicant of the disputed land and render the appeal nugatory, and granted stay alongside the extension of time, with the 30-day filing condition protecting the Respondent.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • An appeal from a subordinate court must be filed within thirty days, but may be admitted out of time on good and sufficient cause being shown
  • Extension of time is a discretionary equitable remedy requiring the applicant to lay a basis for the delay
  • Stay of execution requires substantial loss, absence of unreasonable delay, and an offer of security
  • The purpose of stay is to preserve the subject matter so a successful appellant does not get only a paper judgment

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Leave granted to the Applicant to file the Memorandum of Appeal out of time (prayer 2)
  2. 2.Stay of execution of the Judgment dated 7th June 2023 and Decree dated 4th July 2023 pending the hearing and determination of the Appeal (prayer 4)
  3. 3.The appeal to be filed and served within the next 30 days
  4. 4.Costs of the application to be in the cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Rules 2010Order 42 Rule 6
  • Civil Procedure ActSections 1A, 1B, 3A, 79G
  • Constitution of Kenya 2010Article 159

Cases cited (1)

  • Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 7 others
    (2014) eKLR
On appeal from
Chief Magistrate's Court at Machakos
ELC Case No. 751 of 2017
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act; Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010; Article 159 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Nthenge v Mulwa & 3 others (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E057 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 5710 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in the excerpt. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/5710/eng@2025-07-31

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.