Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedBungoma ELC Appeal (Memorandum of Appeal dated 22/04/2024) from Bungoma CM-ELC No. E036 of 2021· [2025] KEELC 5666 (KLR)

Namwoso v Waswa (Environment and Land Appeal E018 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 5666 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
24 July 2025
2,775 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court confirmed that someone who has lived on family land for decades can claim it through customary trust, even against a registered title holder.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a first appeal from the judgment of Hon. T M Olando (PM) delivered on 17/04/2024 in Bungoma CM-ELC No. E036 of 2021, in which the trial court allowed the Respondent's claim for half of land parcel E.Bukusu/N.Kanduyi/255. The Respondent, widow of Marko Waswa Namwoso, claimed the Appellant, her brother-in-law and registered proprietor, held the suit land in trust for her and her family, having occupied it since before her husband's death in 1980. The Appellant, who obtained title through a succession cause, argued his title was absolute under Section 26 of the Land Registration Act and that the Respondent's claim lay over parcel 299. The Appellant raised six grounds of appeal, principally that the claim was not proved on a balance of probabilities. Framing a single issue, whether the trust claim was proved to the required standard, the court applied Selle v Associated Motor Boat Company on the first appellate court's duty to re-evaluate evidence, and the Supreme Court's five elements for customary trust in Isack M'inanga Kiebia. It found the Respondent's continuous, uncontested occupation, her husband's burial on the land, and the Appellant's entry only in 2011 established a customary trust as an overriding interest under section 28(b) of the Land Registration Act, rendering the Appellant's claim an afterthought. The appeal was dismissed with each party bearing their own costs as a family dispute.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a customary trust was proved as an overriding interest over registered land

Holding

Yes; all elements in Isack M'inanga Kiebia v Isaaya Theuri M'lintari were met based on the Respondent's prolonged occupation, burial of her husband on the land, and the Appellant's non-occupation until 2011

Reasoning

The court applied the Supreme Court's five elements for a customary trust. The Respondent occupied the suit land continuously since before 1980, her husband was buried there, the initial registered owner acquiesced, and the Appellant only entered the land in 2011 after initiating succession proceedings, which the court found to be an afterthought aimed at displacing the Respondent.

p. 5
02

Whether the trial magistrate erred in allowing an unproved claim

Holding

No; on a first appeal the court re-evaluates the evidence and affirms the trial finding, as the claim was proved on a balance of probabilities

Reasoning

Guided by Selle v Associated Motor Boat Company, the court reconsidered and evaluated the evidence afresh. It found the Respondent's continuous and uninterrupted occupation uncontested by the Appellant, establishing a customary trust under section 28(b) of the Land Registration Act, 2012 notwithstanding the Appellant's certificate of title.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • Long-standing possession and occupation of ancestral land gives rise to an inference of a customary trust

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal is dismissed in its entirety
  2. 2.Each party to bear their own costs of the appeal and the costs before the trial Court

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Land Registration ActSection 26
  • Land Registration ActSection 28(b)
  • Registered Land Act (Repealed)Sections 27, 28 and 30(g)

Cases cited (4)

  • Selle and another v Associated Motor Boat Company Ltd and others
    [1968] 1 EA 123
  • Isack M'inanga Kiebia v Isaaya Theuri M'lintari & Another
    [2018] eKLR
  • Juletabi African Adventure Limited & another v Christopher Michael Lockley
    [2017] eKLR
  • Mbui Mukangu vs Mutwiri Mbui
    CA. No. 281 of 2000
On appeal from
Chief Magistrate's Court, Bungoma (CM-ELC)
Bungoma CM-ELC No. E036 of 2021
Jurisdiction invoked
First appeal from the Chief Magistrate's Court (Environment and Land jurisdiction)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Namwoso v Waswa (Environment and Land Appeal E018 of 2024) [2025] KEELC 5666 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Bungoma ELC Appeal (Memorandum of Appeal dated 22/04/2024) from Bungoma CM-ELC No. E036 of 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/5666/eng@2025-07-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.