Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedHolding File (Chamber Summons dated 17/09/2024), Bungoma ELC· [2025] KEELC 5410 (KLR)

Wafula (Suing as the Attorney of Dismus Wanjala Wochuna) v Murunga & 6 others (Environment and Land Case 118 of 2015) [2025] KEELC 5410 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
17 July 2025
1,725 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court refused to hear a case in a temporary file because the original file was transferred to Kisumu, and transfers must follow formal procedure.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Bungoma (Hon. E.C. Cherono, ELC Judge, delivered 17 July 2025) determines a Chamber Summons dated 28/02/2025 by the Plaintiff/Applicant, seeking priority hearing, leave to prosecute an earlier application dated 17/09/2024 through a 'holding file', and vesting orders requiring the Kisumu ELC to return the main file to Bungoma. The background is that the original file was transferred to ELC Kisumu by Justice B. Olao in January 2020 after the Applicant sued the then trial Judge, who recused himself; a holding file was created in October 2024, and the Applicant, unable to trace the original file in Kisumu, filed the present application. The 1st Respondent opposed, contending that the Applicant, acting through a power of attorney, lacked capacity to litigate as he purported to do. The court held that it could not make substantive orders on a holding file without first ascertaining and retrieving the original file; absent official confirmation that the file was lost, the matter is presumed pending or proceeding before ELC Kisumu, and entertaining the holding file application would offend the sub judice doctrine under Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act and principles against forum shopping. Transfers of suits are governed by Section 18(1)(b)(i) of the Civil Procedure Act, requiring formal application and notice. The application dated 17 September 2024 was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether an application may be entertained in a holding file where the original file has been transferred to another court

Holding

The application was dismissed; the court could not determine it without first retrieving the original file, absent which the matter is presumed pending before ELC Kisumu

Reasoning

The original file was transferred to ELC Kisumu by Justice B. Olao in January 2020, after the Applicant sued the trial Judge who recused himself. No official communication confirmed the file lost or missing. In the absence of confirmation from the Deputy Registrar, ELC Kisumu, the court must presume the matter is pending there, and entertaining the holding file application would be sub judice and amount to forum shopping.

p. 4
02

Whether the court could order return of the transferred file

Holding

No; transfers are governed by statute and require formal application with notice to all parties

Reasoning

Section 18(1)(b)(i) of the Civil Procedure Act governs transfer of proceedings, requiring an order of the court upon formal application and with notice to all parties. The Applicant, aware of the circumstances of the transfer, could not claim ignorance and had to follow proper procedures rather than seek vesting orders in a holding file.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A court cannot make substantive orders in a holding file without first ascertaining the status of the original court file
  • Entertaining parallel proceedings in a holding file offends the sub judice rule under Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated 17th September 2024 is dismissed
  2. 2.No order as to costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActOrder 37 Rules 1(f), 3, 8, 11; Order 13 Rules 1 & 2; Section 18(1)(b)(i); Section 6
  • Law of Succession ActSection 54; Paragraph 14 of the Fifth Schedule
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 22(1) & (2)(a-c); Article 50(4),(6),(8),(9); Article 51(1) & (2)(a-c); Article 258(1) & (2)(a-c)
  • Advocates Actnot specified

Cases cited (1)

  • Kenya National Commission on Human Rights v Attorney General; Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (Interested Party)
    [2020] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 37 Rules 1(f), 3, 8 and 11 and Order 13 Rules 1 & 2 of the Civil Procedure Act; Sections 54 and Paragraph 14 of the Fifth Schedule, Law of Succession Act; Articles 22, 50, 51 and 258 of the Constitution

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Wafula (Suing as the Attorney of Dismus Wanjala Wochuna) v Murunga & 6 others (Environment and Land Case 118 of 2015) [2025] KEELC 5410 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Holding File (Chamber Summons dated 17/09/2024), Bungoma ELC. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/5410/eng@2025-07-17

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.