Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNot stated in judgment (Advocate's Application dated 13/05/2024)· [2025] KEELC 5365 (KLR)

Mereka & Company Advocates v Nicola Farms Limited (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E065 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 5365 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya
17 July 2025
1,276 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court confirmed that a taxed Advocate-Client bill becomes enforceable judgment if the client doesn't file a reference, but interest must be claimed in the bill itself.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was an application by an Advocate, David Mukii Mereka, seeking entry of judgment on a Certificate of Taxation for Kshs 406,997.34, plus interest at 14% per annum from the date of the certificate and costs of the application. The Bill of Costs dated 16/02/2023 was taxed on 6/03/2024 and the Certificate of Taxation issued on 6/05/2024. The Client filed Grounds of Opposition contending it never instructed the Advocate in Nairobi ELC 66/2019 and sought dismissal of the application, but filed no written submissions despite service. The Court framed a single issue: whether judgment should be entered as prayed. Relying on Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, which renders a certificate of taxation final unless set aside or altered, and Rule 11 of the Advocates Remuneration Order, which requires an aggrieved party to request reasons in writing and file a reference before a Judge, the Court held that the taxation was unchallenged. Following Lubulellah & Associates Advocates v N. K. Brothers Limited, judgment was entered for the Applicant against the Respondent for Kshs 406,997.34. On interest, the Court followed Otieno, Ragot & Company Advocates v Kenya Airports Authority, holding that Rule 7 interest applies only where the interest charge was included in the Bill of Costs. Since the Applicant omitted the 14% interest charge, Rule 7 did not apply; instead, exercising discretion under Section 26 of the Civil Procedure Act, the Court awarded interest at 14% per annum from 13/05/2024, the date of service of the application, until payment in full. The application was allowed and the Applicant awarded costs of the application.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether judgment should be entered in terms of the Certificate of Taxation absent a reference under Rule 11

Holding

Yes - the certificate of taxation is final unless set aside or altered, and since the Client filed no reference, judgment was entered for Kshs 406,997.34.

Reasoning

The Bill of Costs dated 16/02/2023 was taxed on 6/03/2024 at Kshs 406,997.34 and a Certificate of Taxation issued on 6/05/2024. Under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act the certificate is final unless set aside or altered by the Court. Rule 11 requires an aggrieved party to seek reasons in writing and file a reference before a Judge. The Client filed only Grounds of Opposition, denying instructions, but no reference; the taxation was therefore unchallenged and the only step remaining was entry of judgment.

p. 2
02

From what date interest at 14% per annum should accrue

Holding

Interest awarded at 14% per annum from 13/05/2024 (date of service of the application attaching the Certificate of Taxation) until payment in full, under Section 26 of the Civil Procedure Act, not Rule 7.

Reasoning

Following Otieno, Ragot & Company Advocates v Kenya Airports Authority, Rule 7 interest applies only where the interest charge was included in the Bill of Costs. The Applicant omitted the 14% interest charge from the Bill, so Rule 7 was inapplicable. The Court then exercised its discretion under Section 26 of the Civil Procedure Act and awarded interest from the date of service of the application, as evidenced by the Return of Service filed on 21/05/2024, rather than from the date of the certificate as prayed.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Once a bill of costs has been taxed, a certificate of taxation issued, and no reference filed, the certificate is final as to the amount of costs and the Court need only enter judgment; the applicant need not file suit.
  • Interest at 14% per annum under Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order applies only where the interest charge was included in the Bill of Costs; otherwise the Court falls back on its discretion under Section 26 of the Civil Procedure Act.
  • A party aggrieved by a Taxing Master's decision must request reasons in writing and file a reference before a Judge under Rule 11 of the Advocates Remuneration Order.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application is allowed.
  2. 2.Interest allowed at 14% from 13/5/2024 until payment in full.
  3. 3.The applicant shall have costs of the application.
  4. 4.Judgment entered for the Applicant against the Respondent for the sum of Kshs 406,997.34/=
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 51 of the Advocates Act and Rule 11 of the Advocates Remuneration Order

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mereka & Company Advocates v Nicola Farms Limited (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E065 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 5365 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in judgment (Advocate's Application dated 13/05/2024). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2025/5365/eng@2025-07-17

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.